The Fifth edition of the Apa Publication Manual: Why its Statistics Recommendations are so Controversial

By Fiona Fidler. 2002

111 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Management Science and Operations Research, Statistics and Probability

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/40946ef01b6406eb7a005b6f5976f304d2368b47

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Management Science and Operations Research

In Statistics and Probability

Citations in the corpus

Applying a Score Confidence Interval to Aiken's Item Content-Relevance Index (2004, methodology): “In addition, the use of a confidence interval for Vp is consistent with the growing emphasis placed on the use of confidence intervals in reporting all quantitative psychological research (Fidler, 2002).”
Using Anchor-Based Methods to Determine the Smallest Effect Size of Interest (2019, background): “Psychologists lack clear guidelines for how to interpret the meaningfulness of effect sizes (Fidler, 2002).”
Rationality for Mortals: How People Cope with Uncertainty (2008, background): “The manual offers no explanation as to why both are necessary or what they mean (Fidler, 2002).”
How to Estimate and Interpret Various Effect Sizes (2004, background): “Fleishman (1980) presented the basic theory underlying these estimates.”
Inference by eye: confidence intervals and how to read pictures of data. (2005, background): “For example, the Publication Manual (APA, 2001) gives no examples of CI use and no advice on style for reporting CIs (Fidler, 2002).”
Evaluating the Quality of Evidence from Correlational Research for Evidence-Based Practice (2005, background): “But the editors of 23 journals have gone beyond the APA Publication Manual and have published author guidelines requiring effect size reporting (Fidler, 2002).”
Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: a practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAs (2013, background): “An interesting, though not often used, interpretation of differences between groups can be provided by the common language effect size (McGraw and Wong, 1992), also known as the probability of superiority (Grissom and Kim, 2005), which is a more intuitively understandable statistic than Cohen’s d…”