An Expanded Conceptualization and a New Measure of Compulsive Buying

By Nancy M. Ridgway, Monika Kukar‐Kinney, K. B. Monroe. 2008

544 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3ffe888ab744c8222af641db6f839827927cf1be

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Marketing

Citations in the corpus

Differences and Similarities between Impulse Buying and Variety Seeking: A Personality‐based Perspective (2016, methodology): “Similar measures to assess impulse buying tendency are used by Beatty and Ferrell (1998) and Ridgway, Kukar-Kinney, and Monroe (2008) (Table 1).”
Heavy social networking and online compulsive buying: the mediating role of financial social comparison and materialism (2021, background): “Heavy social networking and compulsive buying Compulsive buying is a well-documented phenomenon in the consumer behavior literature (Faber & O’guinn, 1992; Islam et al., 2018; Ridgway et al., 2008; Tarka, 2020; Zheng, Yang, Liu, et al., 2020).”
Impulsivity, Emotion Regulation, and Mindful Attentional Focus in Compulsive Buying (2012, methodology): “Respondents with scores of 25 and above are classified as compulsive buyers ( Ridgway et al. 2008 ).”
Consumer spending self-control effectiveness and outcome elaboration prompts (2012, background): “Consequences associated with high compulsive consumption include hiding behavior, family arguments, and frequent returns of purchased items (Ridgway, Kukar-Kinney, and Monroe 2008).”
A Neurological Study of Compulsive Buying Behaviour (2011, background): “While some studies indicate that women and men are affected to the same extent (Koran et al. 2006; Mueller et al. 2009), the majority of studies concludes that women are more often and more heavily affected than men (Black 2007; Dittmar 2005a; Kollmann and Unger 2010; Manolis and Roberts 2008 ;R aab”
The role of ideal self-congruence and brand attachment in consumers’ negative behaviour: Compulsive buying and external trash-talking (2018, methodology): “Compulsive buying was assessed using five statements adapted from Ridgway et al. (2008) and rated on a 7-point scale anchored by (1) = not very likely and (7) = very likely.”