Evidence-based public health: moving beyond randomized trials.
By C. Victora, J. Habicht, J. Bryce. American Journal of Public Health, 2004
1,103 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, General Health Professions, Statistics and Probability
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3f3c96a9c563b3ec3df2d1ff686a576d71413dd9
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
In General Health Professions
- K. Nielsen
- K. Albertsen
- Andrew Booth
- J. Noyes
- Karl Bang Christensen
- David Freedman
- C. Hollin
- R. Randall
In Statistics and Probability
- Andrew Booth
- K. Nielsen
- Karl Bang Christensen
- David Freedman
- C. Lyles
- D. D. Des Jarlais
- C. Hollin
- Nicole Crepaz
Citations in the corpus
- On regression adjustments to experimental data (2008, background): “A particularly enthusiastic paper is Victora, Habicht, and Bryce [26].”
- Improving the reporting quality of nonrandomized evaluations of behavioral and public health interventions: the TREND statement. (2004, background): “In this issue, Victora et al.(6) make a strong argument that evidencebased public health will neces sarily involve the use of research designs other than RCTs.”
- Success or failure? Interpreting and understanding the impact of interventions in four similar worksites (2006, background): “Although the randomized controlled trial and its variations potentially offer the opportunity to control a number of factors such as selection bias, confounding variables, and information bias (Cook, 1994 ), there are important factors that neither randomized controlled trials nor the various quasi”
- On regression adjustments in experiments with several treatments (2008, neutral): “(viii) Victora, Habicht, and Bryce (2004) favor adjustment.”
- Evaluating offending behaviour programmes (2008, background): “Using the Scientific Methods Scale, Weisburd et al. coded the 308 studies (of which 15 per cent had a fully randomized design) and compared their outcomes according to experimental design. In contrast to Heinsman and Shadish (1996), Weisburd et al.”
- Participants' appraisals of process issues and the effects of stress management interventions (2007, neutral): “Accepted 29 January 2007 (Cook & Campbell, 1979; Cook & Shadish, 1994; Kristensen, 2005; Netterstrom, 1999; Randall, 2002; Victora, Habicht, & Bryce, 2004 ).”
- Synthesising quantitative and qualitative evidence to inform guidelines on complex interventions: clarifying the purposes, designs and outlining some methods (2019, background): “Publication of guidance on designing complex intervention process evaluations and other works advocating mixed- methods approaches to intervention research have stimulated better quality evidence for synthesis.(1) 7–13 Methods for synthesising summary box”