Improving the reporting quality of nonrandomized evaluations of behavioral and public health interventions: the TREND statement.

By D. D. Des Jarlais, C. Lyles, Nicole Crepaz. American Journal of Public Health, 2004

2,427 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, General Health Professions, Statistics and Probability

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e68bedc4e35a45e0c0f8779f210c462508a13a3e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In General Health Professions

In Statistics and Probability

Citations in the corpus

Can Mobile Phone Apps Influence People’s Health Behavior Change? An Evidence Review (2016, background): “Additionally, the Transparent Reporting of Evaluations with Nonrandomized Designs (TREND) statement could assist to improve the reporting quality of nonrandomized evaluations of public health interventions [56].”
Developing theory-informed behaviour change interventions to implement evidence into practice: a systematic approach using the Theoretical Domains Framework (2012, neutral): “The design of implementation interventions requires a systematic approach with a strong rationale for design and explicit reporting of the intervention development process [6-8].”
Experimental manipulations of self-affirmation: A systematic review (2006, positive): “Experiments conducted in the field of psychology are not unlike intervention trials conducted in medicine and public health; therefore, greater attention and adherence to reporting guidelines such as CONSORT (Moher, Schulz, & Altman, 2001 ) and TREND (Des Jarlais, Lyles, Crepaz, & The TREND Group, ”
Applying the pathways to nature connectedness at a societal scale: a leverage points perspective (2020, background): “…theoretical basis, clear delivery content and defined outcomes of the evaluation met checklist criteria for public health interventions (Des Jarlais et al. 2004), with the design approach providing convincing evidence of intervention success within a public health context (Rychetnik et al.…”
What are the most effective intervention techniques for changing physical activity self-efficacy and physical activity behaviour--and are they the same? (2011, background): “Intervention developers should be encouraged to follow current guidelines for the reporting of study and intervention components [24, 25, 26] to allow for subsequent replication of successful interventions and to enhance our understanding of which techniques are responsible for behaviour change.”
Specifying and reporting complex behaviour change interventions: the need for a scientific method (2009, methodology): “The extension of these guidelines to non-pharmacological trials [36], the TREND Statement for the transparent reporting of evaluations with non-randomised designs [37] and the STROBE Statement for strengthening the reporting of observational studies [38] all call for intervention content to be descr”
Evaluating offending behaviour programmes (2008, background): “It was advocated that rather than dismissing evidence from quasi-experimental studies, use should be made of guidelines for conducting high-quality quasi-experimental studies (see Des Jarlais et al., 2004).”
How can we increase translation of research into practice? Types of evidence needed. (2007, background): “A challenging and presently unresolved issue concerns the fundamental question of “what constitutes evidence and when do we have enough evidence to translate?” Like many public health researchers (9, 10), we think that conceptualizations of evidence need to include, but also go beyond, evidence from”