The affective revolution in organizational behavior: The emergence of a paradigm.
By Sigal G. Barsade, Arthur P. Brief, Sandra E. Spataro. 2003
348 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3f126d1391b8e05ed0e625d3df9315ec6654da11
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Sigal G. Barsade
- Stéphane Côté
- Neal M. Ashkanasy
- R. Humphrey
- Alicia A. Grandey
- Gerben A. van Kleef
- Arnold B. Bakker
- Adam M. Grant
Citations in the corpus
- Work‐family interference, emotional labor and burnout (2006, background): “Although the role of emotional experiences in our physical and psychosocial well-being has long been recognized it has only recently received consideration within the broader framework of organizational behavior (Brief and Weiss, 2002; Barsade et al., 2003).”
- Emotional influence at work: Take it EASI (2012, unknown): “Scholarly attention to emotions at work has taken such a flight that Barsade, Brief, and Spataro (2003) even referred to an ‘‘affective revolution.’’”
- What’s Love Got to Do with It? A Longitudinal Study of the Culture of Companionate Love and Employee and Client Outcomes in a Long-term Care Setting (2014, background): “Now, given the ‘‘affective revolution’’ in organizational behavior (Barsade, Brief, and Spataro, 2003), which offers a return to a more complete examination of the many emotions people experience at work, we can revive the study of this basic human emotion at work, doing so at the collective,…”
- Current Emotion Research in Organizational Behavior (2011, background): “…a veritable explosion of interest in the study of affect and emotions in organizations (see Ashkanasy & Ashton-James, 2005, for a review) and, by the beginning of the 21st century, what Barsade et al. (2003) identified as “the affective revolution in organizational behavior” (p. 3) was under way.”