Testing Competing Models of the Leisure Constraint Negotiation Process in a Corporate Employee Recreation Setting

By J. Hubbard, R. Mannell. 2001

503 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3e3e820b55001ec59b3c39a65e1caa973752a3d8

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Perceived Constraints on Recreational Sport Participation: Investigating their Relationship with Intrinsic Motivation, Extrinsic Motivation and Amotivation (2002, background): “Finally, Hubbard and Mannell (2001) examined the role of the motivation in the hierarchical model of leisure constraints. The objective of this study was to investigate the multiple interactions between constraints, motivation, negotiation and participation, with the use of structural modeling. The ”
Examining Relationships between Leisure Involvement, Psychological Commitment and Loyalty to a Recreation Agency (2004, background): “In addition to being derived from the consumer behavior literature, Iwasaki and Havitz's (1998) model is grounded in the literature focusing on leisure and recreation. For example, Lee and Zeiss (1980) found that highly committed major league baseball spectators tend to show loyalty to their favorit”
Having More by Doing Less: The Paradox of Leisure Constraints in Later Life (2008, background): “Sixth, constraint models, such those identified by Hubbard and Mannell (2001) might be expanded to include constraints that may be desirable rather than detrimental.”
The Influence of Childhood (2012, methodology): “Following Hubbard and Mannell’s (2001) lead, some operational models of adult participation have been proposed (e.”
Testing the effects of congruity, travel constraints, and self-efficacy on travel intentions: An alternative decision-making model (2012, methodology): “Although other constraint researchers have not included selfefficacy in their investigations, some have suspected that it could be an important factor influencing the success of negotiation efforts (e.g., Henderson, Bedini, Hecht, & Schuler, 1995; Hubbard & Mannell, 2001).”
Marathons for the Masses: Exploring the Role of Negotiation-Efficacy and Involvement on Running Commitment (2012, background): “The constraint negotiation propositions developed by Jackson et al. have been supported by a number of studies (Henderson, Bedini, Hecht, & Schuler, 1995; Hubbard & Mannell, 2001; Jackson & Rucks, 1995; Loucks-Atkinson & Mannell, 2007; Son, Kerstetter, & Mowen, 2008; White, 2008).”
A Structural Model of Leisure Constraints Negotiation in Outdoor Recreation (2008, methodology): “Notably, Hubbard and Mannell (2001) used confirmatory factor analysis and structural equation modeling to examine four competing models of the negotiation process.”
Visits to the Swedish Mountains: Constraints and Motivations (2005, methodology): “Hubbard and Mannell (2001) note ‘‘…the role of motivation in the constraints process has received little attention’’.”
Weekly job crafting and leisure crafting: Implications for meaning‐making and work engagement (2017, background): “Furthermore, individuals typically participate in weekly leisure activities that occur less frequently than the days of a week, meaning that, on several days, no leisure activities are undertaken (Hubbard & Mannell, 2001).”
Testing Alternative Leisure Constraint Negotiation Models: An Extension of Hubbard and Mannell's Study (2008, methodology): “…motivation, middle-aged and older adults, physically active leisure Leisure researchers have used various constraints models to guide the study of physically active leisure participation and nonparticipation (e.g., Alexandris, Barkoukis, Tsorbatzoudis, & Groulos, 2003; Hubbard & Mannell, 2001).”
Crafting one’s leisure time in response to high job strain (2016, background): “For example, by waking up earlier and going to bed later, people use their autonomy at home in order to participate in leisure despite their quantitative home demands (Hubbard and Mannell, 2001).”
Constraints and Motivators: A New Model to Explain Sport Consumer Behavior (2010, methodology): “Goodness of fit indices used to evaluate overall fit of the model in the current study were the comparative fit index (CFI) and the standardized root-mean-square residual (SRMR) following Hu and Bentler’s (1999) recommendation.”
Effects of Travel Motivation, Past Experience, Perceived Constraint, and Attitude on Revisit Intention (2009, background): “…constraint negotiation as a construct intermediate between perceived constraint and leisure participation and argued that the constraint negotiation process can explain why more constraint does not necessarily mean less participation (e.g., Crompton and Kim 2004; Hubbard and Mannell 2001).”
The Impact of Constraints on Motivation, Activity Attachment, and Skier Intentions to Continue (2011, methodology): “Similar measurement scales and statistical analysis to Hubbard and Mannell (2001) were used but in a different context of park visitors in this study.”