Working Memory in Second Language Acquisition and Processing
By Z. Wen, M. Mota, A. Mcneill. 2015
132 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Acknowledgements Notes on Contributors Foreword: Michael Bunting & Randall Engle Zhisheng Wen, Mailce Borges Mota and Arthur McNeill: Introduction and Overview Part I: Theoretical Perspectives and Models 1. Alan Baddeley: Working Memory in Second Language Learning 2. Nelson Cowan: Second-Language Use, Theories of Working Memory, and the Vennian Mind 3. Zhisheng Wen: Working Memory in Second Language Acquisition and Processing: The Phonological/Executive Model 4. Yanping Dong and Rendong Cai: Working Memory and Interpreting: A Commentary on Theoretical Models Part II: Working Memory in L2 Processing 5. Sun-A Kim, Kiel Christianson and Jerome Packard: Working Memory in L2 Character Processing: The Case of Learning to Read Chinese 6. Yuncai Dai: Working Memory in L2 Sentence Processing: The Case with Relative Clause Attachment 7. Alan Juffs: Working Memory and Sentence Processing: A Commentary Part III: Working Memory in L2 Interaction and Performance 8. Shaofeng Li: Working Memory, Language Analytical Ability and L2 Recasts 9. Mohammad Javad Ahmadian: Working Memory, Online Planning and L2 Self-Repair Behavior 10. Yanbin Lu: Working Memory, Cognitive Resources and L2 Written Performance 11. Peter Skehan: Working Memory and Second Language Performance: A Commentary Part IV: Working Memory in L2 Instruction and Development 12. Kindra Santamaria and Gretchen Sunderman: Working Memory in Processing Instruction: The Acquisition of L2 French Clitic 13. Kaitlyn Tagarelli, Mailce Borges Mota and Patrick Rebuschat: Working Memory, Learning Conditions and L2 Syntax Acquisition 14. Melissa Baralt: Working Memory, Cognitive Complexity and L2 Recasts in Online Language Teaching 15. Anne E. Mitchell, Scott Jarvis, Michelle O'Malley and Irina Konstantinova : Working Memory Measures and L2 Proficiency 16. Clare Wright: Working Memory and L2 Development across the Life Span: A Commentary Part V: Final Commentary 17. John Williams: Working Memory in SLA Research: Challenges and Prospects Index
Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Language and Linguistics, Literature and Literary Theory
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3d42c66f9d0c913116363a63696a1e980e39eefe
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Developmental and Educational Psychology
- Masatoshi Sato
- S. Loewen
- P. Skehan
- Z. Wen
- K. Rajagopalan
- A. Biedroń
- K. Morgan‐Short
- Mandy Faretta-Stutenberg
In Language and Linguistics
- Masatoshi Sato
- K. Rajagopalan
- S. Loewen
- P. Skehan
- A. Biedroń
- K. Morgan‐Short
- Mandy Faretta-Stutenberg
- Z. Wen
In Literature and Literary Theory
- Masatoshi Sato
- K. Rajagopalan
- S. Loewen
- Z. Wen
- P. Skehan
- K. Morgan‐Short
- Mandy Faretta-Stutenberg
- A. Biedroń
Citations in the corpus
- Foreign language aptitude theory: Yesterday, today and tomorrow (2016, background): “We now have a flourishing research tradition exploring the role of working memory in SLA and aptitude (Wen & Skehan 2011; Biedroń 2012; Biedroń & Szczepaniak 2012; Wen 2014; Wen et al. 2015; Wen 2016).”
- The Routledge handbook of English language teaching (2018, background): “…He went over the report and He went through the report , refer to the same event, they have each resulted from a different construal, with the former ( went over ) focusing on the completion of the activity and the latter ( went through ) highlighting the care or effort put into reading the report.”
- The interplay of individual differences and context of learning in behavioral and neurocognitive second language development (2018, background): “…there is evidence that the relationship between WM and L2 abilities may be mediated by factors such as learner proficiency (Linck et al., 2014), learning target (e.g. McDonald, 2006; Sagarra and Herschensohn, 2010), and learning condition or context (e.g. Tagarelli et al., 2015; Williams, 2012).”
- Interaction and instructed second language acquisition (2018, background): “There are a number of interlocutor individual differences that have been posited to influence interaction, although the amount of research varies depending on the characteristic (Robinson 2005; DeKeyser 2012; Mackey et al. 2012; Baddeley 2015; Li 2017).”