Systematic reviews and meta-analysis.

By L. Askie, M. Offringa. Seminars in Fetal & Neonatal Medicine, 2015

651 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, General Health Professions, Statistics and Probability

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3d341ae8233a35b5c435d6b5f1ba9ee01eb3c57e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In General Health Professions

In Statistics and Probability

Citations in the corpus

Review articles: purpose, process, and structure (2018, background): “In contrast, a systematic literature review aims to Bcomprehensively locate and synthesize research that bears on a particular question, using organized, transparent, and replicable procedures at each step in the process^ (Littell et al. 2008, p. 1).”
First-Generation College Students as Academic Learners: A Systematic Review (2020, background): “Systematic reviews aim to make sense of large quantities of information by identifying salient themes and gaps in existing knowledge (Littell et al., 2008).”
Using Social Norms to Change Behavior and Increase Sustainability in the Real World: A Systematic Review of the Literature (2019, methodology): “remaining articles (N = 523) were assessed under our practical screen—PS criteria [74].”
Quantitative Research: A Successful Investigation in Natural and Social Sciences (2020, neutral): “It is believed that the first meta-analysis study was conducted by Karl Pearson in 1904 when he attempted to synthesize the independent vaccine studies concerning typhoid [Littel et al., 2008].”
An overview of the literature on technology roadmapping (TRM): Contributions and trends (2013, background): “The systematic review inthis study of theexistingliterature relating to technology roadmapping aims to comprehensively identify and synthesize research on a particular theme by applying structured, transparent and replicable procedures for every phase of the process [8].”
Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis: Understanding the Best Evidence in Primary Healthcare (2013, background): “” However, incorporating research into practice is time consuming, and so we need methods of facilitating easy access to evidence for busy clinicians.[1] Ganeshkumar et al.”
Rating the rat: Global patterns and research priorities in impacts and management of rodent pests (2014, methodology): “We performed a review of scientific literature by adopting a priori defined criteria, so that the review process can be both repeated by others and updated in the future (Littell et al. 2008, Lowry et al. 2012).”
Recognition of Emotions in Autism: A Formal Meta-Analysis (2013, background): “lyzing large collections of data from individual studies, meta-analysis can overcome the problem of heterogeneity in results due to small sample size and heterogeneity in study characteristics (Egger 1997a; Green 2005; Van den Noortgate and Onghena 2006).”
The effect of loneliness on depression: A meta-analysis (2018, methodology): “Moderator analysis in a meta-analysis study should be planned appropriately with the aim of the study and should be performed in accordance with this plan (Littel et al., 2008).”