Annual Meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education

By E. Matthew. 2002

267 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3cf87970f2f20e229f241afd15ab77b2953fd4bd

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Building Better Open-Source Tools to Support Fairness in Automated Scoring (2017, background): “These stacked models can then be combined in a final linear model which can be examined in the usual manner for fairness considerations (Madnani and Cahill, 2016).”
Ethics in classroom assessment practices: Issues and attitudes (2007, background): “In addition, several studies have examined in-service and preservice teacher attitudes regarding the appropriateness of standardized test preparation strategies (e.g., Bright, 1992; Kher-Durlabhju & Lacina-Gifford, 1992; Moore, 1993).”
Measuring the beginning: a quantitative study of the transition to higher education (2014, unknown): “College Academic Self-efficacy Scale (CASES; Owen and Froman 1988).”
The many dimensions of algorithmic fairness in educational applications (2019, background): “…the fairness of the automated scoring systems across different groups, for example speakers of different languages or test-takers with disabilities (Burstein and Chodorow, 1999; Bridgeman et al., 2012; Wang and von Davier, 2014; Wang et al., 2016; An et al., 2016; Loukina and Buzick, 2017).”
Developing the theory of formative assessment (2009, background): “…Threfall’s (2005) suggestion that teachers may need to exercise ‘contingent assessment planning’, i.e., limiting the teaching plan so that the interactions are kept within the range of alternatives that he can foresee and be prepared for (see also Ciofalo & Wylie, 2006, Wylie & Wiliam, 2006; 2007).”