Mass media and public policy

By David Strömberg. 2001

200 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Media Technology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3cdaad2cd58c58cbd71c77bee9511cbc274f527e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Media Technology

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

The Effects of Participatory Budgeting on Municipal Expenditures and Infant Mortality in Brazil (2014, background): “See Wampler (2003), Avritzer and Wampler (2005) and Avritzer”
Handcuffs for the Grabbing Hand? Media Capture and Government Accountability (2006, unknown): “In the first period an incumbent is exogenously in power.”
Does Greater Accountability Improve the Quality of Public Service Delivery? Evidence from Uganda (2005, background): “Unless such evidence is available, it will be difficult to provide empirical backing for demands to increase accountability (Ebrahim, 2003), among others as a means to improve institutional effectiveness (Stromberg, 2001).”
The Political Economy of Government Responsiveness: Theory and Evidence from India (2002, unknown): “[24] Strömberg, David, [2001], Mass Media and Public Policy, European Economic Review, 45, 652-663.”
Media and Politics (2015, background): “Even if evaluations do not change on average, information increases the precision in people’s evaluations on a particular topic and hence, its weight in the election decision (as modeled in section 5 of Strömberg 2001).”
Knowing What Others Know: Coordination Motives in Information Acquisition (2007, unknown): “Woodford (2002) and Mankiw and Reis (2002) add exogenous information heterogeneity and price-setting complementarity to get bigger real effects from a demand shock in a setting like that of Lucas (1972).”
Inequality and Media Capture (2008, unknown): “Strömberg (2001, 2004) provides empirical evidence that in the U.S. in the 1930s radio diffusion in a county was positively correlated with the level of public expenditures in the region.”