Identified versus introjected approach and introjected avoidance motivations in school and in sports: The limited benefits of self- worth strivings

By A. Assor, Maarten Vansteenkiste, Avi Kaplan. 2009

283 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3cba60e66ae34f7910a0cff228f5b6c81665c362

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

1. Richard M. Ryan
2. Maarten Vansteenkiste
3. J. Reeve
4. Bart Soenens
5. Edward L. Deci
6. Marylène Gagné
7. A. van den Broeck
8. L. Haerens

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. Maarten Vansteenkiste
2. J. Reeve
3. Richard M. Ryan
4. Bart Soenens
5. Edward L. Deci
6. W. Lens
7. Adam M. Grant
8. Marylène Gagné

In Social Psychology

1. Maarten Vansteenkiste
2. Richard M. Ryan
3. Edward L. Deci
4. J. Reeve
5. Bart Soenens
6. A. van den Broeck
7. Nathalie Aelterman
8. Marylène Gagné

Citations in the corpus

• Autonomous and controlled regulation of performance-approach goals: Their relations to perfectionism and educational outcomes (2010, background): “The inclusion of approach oriented items seemed important as controlled reasons can involve either avoiding negative outcomes or approaching positive ones (Assor et al. 2009).”
• The development of the five mini-theories of self-determination theory: an historical overview, emerging trends, and future directions (2010, background): “Assor, Vansteenkiste, and Kaplan (2009) posited that introjected regulation could be bifurcated into approach and avoidance subtypes.”
• The Multidimensional Work Motivation Scale: Validation evidence in seven languages and nine countries (2015, background): “The problem in this version seemed to lie with the introjection subscale, for which other problems have been pointed out (Assor et al., 2009).”
• Building a science of motivated persons: Self-determination theory’s empirical approach to human experience and the regulation of behavior. (2021, background): “Sometimes scholars have been selective, zooming in on specific subtypes (e.g., Assor et al., 2009), and at other times exhaustive, for instance, through the provision of an ordered pattern of correlates between subtypes and external outcomes (Howard et al. 2017).”
• The performance implications of ambivalent initiative: The interplay of autonomous and controlled motivations (2011, background): “On the other hand, promotion-focused forms of controlled motivation typically involve less pressure (Assor et al., 2009; see also Smith, Duda, Allen, & Hall, 2002), and there are potential benefits of controlled motivation for driving the pursuit of rewards and self-affirmation (e.”
• Fostering Personal Meaning and Self-relevance: A Self-Determination Theory Perspective on Internalization (2018, background): “…(Reeve et al., 2011; Skinner et al., 2009), introjected regulation equally relates positively to maladaptive coping (Ryan & Connell, 1989), negative affect (Assor et al., 2009), anxiety, emotional disaffection (Van der Kaap-Deeder et al., 2016) and dropout over the longer term (Calvo et al., 2010).”