Innovation From the Inside Out

By Erik Simanis, S. Hart. 2009

202 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3ca633f052abc69b42a2688c9854e22f04bcdbe1

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Improved stoves in India: A study of sustainable business models (2011, background): “Various strategies have been attempted to overcome these challenges: Indian Tobacco Corporation (ITC) and Hindustan Lever Limited (HLL) have been successful in expanding their procurement and marketing channels in rural India by combining the use of information technology (IT) and involvement of loc”
A Systematic Review of the Bottom/Base of the Pyramid Literature: Cumulative Evidence and Future Directions (2020, background): “The social side of BoP business initiatives is less comprehensively addressed, to say the least (Berger and Nakata 2013; Hart and Christensen 2002; Simanis and Hart 2009).”
Mindful consumption: a customer-centric approach to sustainability (2011, background): “While in the past BoP was an unserved market, now it is receiving increasing attention from business as an under-tapped opportunity for new growth (Hart 2007; Prahalad 2004; Rangan et al. 2007; Simanis and Hart 2009; Viswanathan et al. 2009).”
Inclusive Business at the Base of the Pyramid: The Role of Embeddedness for Enabling Social Innovations (2018, unknown): “The emerging ‘Social Resource Based View’ (SRBV) of the firm emphasizes the significance of embeddedness, or the structural and relational qualities of the organization’s social ties, for implementing inclusive business approaches (Tate and Bals, 2016; Valente, 2012; Simanis and Hart, 2009).”
The empty rhetoric of poverty reduction at the base of the pyramid (2012, background): “A good starting point is the article ‘Innovation from the Inside Out’ by Simanis and Hart (2009) because it represents the latest thinking, and it is here that differences between BoP 1 and BoP 2 are cast in terms of contrasting paradigms of corporate innovation strategy.”