Consequences of measurement problems in strategic management research: the case of Amihud and Lev

By B. Boyd, Steve Gove, Michael A. Hitt. 2005

126 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Management Information Systems

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3c8b0cc9334323cb0901330e3d9cafe941e352b4

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

1. D. Bergh
2. B. Boyd
3. Michael A. Hitt
4. Clint Chadwick
5. Dave J. Ketchen
6. J. Molloy
7. Robert E. Ployhart
8. Simon J. Golden

In Management Information Systems

1. Michael A. Hitt
2. Clint Chadwick
3. Robert E. Ployhart
4. Dave J. Ketchen
5. D. Bergh

Citations in the corpus

• Contingency Hypotheses in Strategic Management Research (2012, background): “Second, constructs in strategic management studies are often broad in nature yet typically measured with single indicators (Boyd et al., 2005a).”
• Making Intangibles “Tangible” in Tests of Resource-Based Theory (2011, background): “This represents a marked improvement over the 13% reported by Boyd, Gove, and Hitt (2007b) in their study of strategic management empirical tests published between 1998 and 2000.”