Scientific teams and institutional collaborations: Evidence from U.S. universities, 1981-1999

By J. Adams, Grant C. Black, J. Clemmons, Paula E. Stephan. 2005

593 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Management of Technology and Innovation, Statistics and Probability, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3c8951311e6f1b95896277b81970d9bd70247141

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Management of Technology and Innovation

In Statistics and Probability

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

Education and mobility (2008, background): “Furthermore, measurement error could bias the estimates of regression (1).”
The Contribution of Skilled Immigration and International Graduate Students to U.S. Innovation (2005, background): “26 corporations have significantly increased patenting activity and innovation abroad (Maskus 2000) and recent evidence indicates that the U.S. universities are also increasingly collaborating with universities abroad (Adams et al. 2004).”
Acquisition of European research funds and its effect on international scientific collaboration. (2013, background): “The creation and diffusion of knowledge supported by networks also follows geographical logics by its nature, favoring short distance interactions over longer distance ones (Adams et al. 2005; Fischer et al. 2006, Breschi and Lissoni 2009; Hoekman et al. 2009).”
Impact of public and private research funding on scientific production: The case of nanotechnology (2012, background): “Adams et al. (2005) show that top universities and departments that have earned awards, have larger teams (with an increased scientific division of labor at the international level) and have more government funding.”
Breaking the Ivory Tower: Academic Entrepreneurship in the Life Sciences in UK and Germany (2011, unknown): “Larger scientific teams can build on greater collective knowledge and effort, increasing publications, research quality, and influence through citations to one's work (Adams et al., 2005; Wuchty et al., 2007).”
WHO'S PATENTING IN THE UNIVERSITY? EVIDENCE FROM THE SURVEY OF DOCTORATE RECIPIENTS (2007, background): “Moreover, as changing patterns in authorship demonstrate so well, increasingly scientists work in teams (Adams et al , 2005 ).”
Peer effects in science: evidence from the dismissal of scientists in Nazi Germany (2012, background): “…specification that directly tests localized peer effects.1 Recently a number of studies have suggested that falling communication costs reduced the importance of location in academic research (Kim, Morse, and Zingales, 2009, Adams et al. 2005, Agrawal and Goldfarb 2008, Rosenblat and Mobius, 2004).”
Enhancing the Effectiveness of Team Science (2015, background): “Science and engineering teams and larger groups, as reflected in publications, have consistently expanded in size over the past five decades (Wuchty, Jones, and Uzzi, 2007; Baker, Day, and Salas, 2006; Adams et al., 2005).”
Mapping world scientific collaboration: Authors, institutions, and countries (2012, background): “Collaboration has increased at the author, institution, and country level as supported by a number of studies (e.g., Glänzel, 2001; Adams et al., 2005; Wagner and Leydesdorff, 2005; Wagner, 2005).”
An Empirical Analysis of the Propensity of Academics to Engage in Informal University Technology Transfer (2007, background): “Adams et al. (2005) assessed scientific teams and institutional collaborations, at the level of the individual researcher.”