Culture: A Fundamental Context for the Stress and Coping Paradigm

343 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Consumer revenge behavior: A cross-cultural perspective (2009, background): “For instance, Chun et al. (2006) and Kawanishi (1995) found that unlike individualists, collectivists have a stronger sense of external locus of control versus a weaker internal locus of control (and vice versa), because they attribute success to good luck, and stress to bad luck.”
Organizational stress, psychological strain, and work outcomes in six national contexts: A closer look at the moderating influences of coping styles and decision latitude (2010, background): “The clinical literature has clearly demonstrated the importance of cultural differences in coping with social and interpersonal stresses ( Chun et al. , 2006”
Culture’s Consequences on Coping (2011, methodology): “As noted earlier, the cultural syndromes of collectivism and individualism are the two most frequently enlisted cultural constructs to explain cross-cultural divergences in coping behaviors by cultural coping researchers (Chun et al., 2006). In particularly, there has been an increased empirical eff”