Estimating State IQ: Measurement Challenges and Preliminary Correlates.

By Michael A. McDaniel. 2006

134 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Genetics, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3c19de4282f46c641f7506ccd00f78c071834155

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. Richard Lynn
2. H. Rindermann
3. Jelte M. Wicherts
4. H.L.J. van der Maas
5. Conor V. Dolan
6. T. Vanhanen
7. Niklas Potrafke

In Genetics

1. H. Rindermann
2. Richard Lynn

In Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health

1. H. Rindermann
2. Richard Lynn

Citations in the corpus

• Relevance of education and intelligence for the political development of nations: Democracy, rule of law and political liberty (2008, unknown): “It is therefore not surprising that McDaniel (2006) found a positive correlation of r =.34 between cognitive ability and “ government effectiveness ” at the state level in the USA.”
• Relevance of education and intelligence at the national level for the economic welfare of people (2008, background): “Because of these ambiguities, Whetzel and McDaniel (2006) demand for the IQ–GDP-relationship more “theory development and efforts at causal modeling” (p. 457).”
• In Italy, north–south differences in IQ predict differences in income, education, infant mortality, stature, and literacy (2010, methodology): “The 14 IQ point difference between the most northerly region of Friuli-Venezia (IQ=103) and the most southerly region of Sicily (IQ=89) can be comparedwith the 10.1 IQ point difference in the United States between the highest and lowest states (Massachusetts IQ=104.3; Mississippi IQ=94.2) (McDaniel,”