The Predictive Validity of Risk Assessment with Violent Young Offenders
By Rosalind E. H. Catchpole, H. Gretton. 2003
259 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3bd06ddc26a971091b721d9ad3a02f08c7408eb8
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Clinical Psychology
- M. Campbell
- Carolyn M. Houlding
- F. Schmidt
- S. Wormith
- Keira C. Stockdale
- M. Olver
- M. Peterson-badali
- Jodi L. Viljoen
In Sociology and Political Science
- M. Campbell
- Carolyn M. Houlding
- F. Schmidt
- S. Wormith
- Keira C. Stockdale
- M. Olver
- M. Peterson-badali
- Jodi L. Viljoen
Citations in the corpus
- Can callous-unemotional traits enhance the understanding, diagnosis, and treatment of serious conduct problems in children and adolescents? A comprehensive review. (2014, unknown): “3 Catchpole & Gretton (2003) N 74; age 15–19; 85% male; forensic sample.”
- Matching Court-Ordered Services with Treatment Needs (2009, background): “Thus, intervening with youth who continue to reoffend is an important goal for researchers and clinicians alike ( Catchpole & Gretton, 2003 ).”
- The Relationship Between Matching Service to Criminogenic Need and Recidivism in Male and Female Youth (2012, background): “Consistent with the findings of several previous studies (Catchpole & Gretton, 2003; Jung & Rawana, 1999; Olver et al., 2009; Onifade et al., 2008), youth’s YLS/CMI scores significantly predicted recidivism for the entire sample and remained predictive when examined separately for males and females.”
- Assessment of Reoffense Risk in Adolescents Who Have Committed Sexual Offenses (2009, unknown): “A number of studies have supported the psychometric properties of the YLS/CMI (e.g., Catchpole & Gretton, 2003; Edens et al., 2007; Holsinger, Lowenkamp, & Latessa, 2006; Marshall, Egan, English, & Jones, 2006; Onifade et al., 2008; Schmidt, Hoge, & Gomes, 2005; Schwalbe, 2007; Thompson & Pope,…”
- Predictive Validity of the Structured Assessment for Violence Risk in Youth (SAVRY) With Juvenile Offenders (2008, background): “A third available study on the SAVRY (Catchpole & Gretton, 2003) examined the forensic files of 63 incarcerated male and 11 incarcerated female adolescents.”
- Comparative Analyses of the YLS/CMI, SAVRY, and PCL:YV in Adolescent Offenders: A 10-year Follow-Up Into Adulthood (2011, background): “The SAVRY can predict violent and nonviolent recidivism over 1- and 3-year follow-up periods in samples of adolescent offenders (Catchpole & Gretton, 2003; Lodewijks, Doreleijers, & De Ruiter, 2008; Meyers & Schmidt, 2008).”
- Risk Assessment With Young Offenders (2009, methodology): “Although one study found identical predictive accuracy between the two measures for both outcomes (Catchpole & Gretton, 2003), in another the SAVRY demonstrated stronger prediction (Welsh et al., 2008).”
- Assessing Risk for Violence in Adolescents Who Have Sexually Offended (2008, background): “Catchpole and Gretton (2003) found that SAVRY risk ratings were significantly related to violent reoffending.”