Assessing Risk for Violence in Adolescents Who Have Sexually Offended

By Jodi L. Viljoen, M. Scalora, L. Cuadra, S. Bader, Veronica Chavez, D. Ullman, L. Lawrence. 2008

154 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3ffddc617144ede98e0ae14c1b32d553cb7c6075

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Actuarial Sentencing: An “Unsettled” Proposition (2013, unknown): “…allow for, and require, detailed consideration of the offender’s future conduct (Cunningham & Reidy, 2002; Dutton & Kropp, 2000; Grann & Langstrom, 2007; Monahan, 2006; Murrie & Balusek, 2008; Netter, 2007; Roehl & Guertin, 2000; Schwalbe, 2007; Scott, 2008; Vess, 2009; Viljoen et al., 2008).”
Comparative Analyses of the YLS/CMI, SAVRY, and PCL:YV in Adolescent Offenders: A 10-year Follow-Up Into Adulthood (2011, background): “The longest mean follow-up period for the SAVRY was 7.5 years (Viljoen et al., 2008).”
Assessment of Reoffense Risk in Adolescents Who Have Committed Sexual Offenses (2009, background): “This is also consistent with the age groupings used by Viljoen et al. (2008) in their examination of whether age moderated the predictive validity of the SAVRY and J-SOAP-II.”
Risk Assessment With Young Offenders (2009, result): “…SAVRY and PCL-YV appeared to be somewhat lower compared to specialized tools such as the J-SOAP-II or the ERASOR (e.g., Morton, 2003; Skowron, 2004; Viljoen et al., 2008), although the results from this literature have also been mixed, perhaps in part because of low sexual recidivism base rates.”
Risk-Needs Assessment in Juvenile Justice (2011, methodology): “However, given evidence that age does not have an appreciable effect on the SAVRY’s association with later violence (Viljoen et al., 2008), it is not clear that the younger sample impairs the generalizability of the findings in this study.”
Handbook of violence risk assessment. (2010, methodology): “…have ranged from .89 to .97 ( Epperson & Ralston, 2015 ; Ralston, Sarkar, Philipp, & Epperson, 2015 , 2018 ; Ralston, Epperson, & Edwards, 2014 ; Viljoen et al., 2008 ), whereas individual items have displayed greater variability, with ICC 1 values ranging from .67 to 1.00 ( Ralston et al.,…”
The accuracy of recidivism risk assessments for sexual offenders: a meta-analysis of 118 prediction studies. (2009, unknown): “…39 Hanson & Harris (2000) 98 Thornton (2000) 40 Hanson et al. (1993) 99 Thornton (2002) 41 Harris et al. (2003) 100 Tough (2001) 42 Hartwell (2001) 101 Viljoen et al. (2008) 43 Hecker et al. (2002) 102 Vrana et al. (2008) 44 Hill et al. (2008) 103 [Washington State] Barnoski (2005) 45 Hills…”