Risk Assessment With Young Offenders

267 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Comparative Analyses of the YLS/CMI, SAVRY, and PCL:YV in Adolescent Offenders: A 10-year Follow-Up Into Adulthood (2011, methodology): “This latter finding differs from a recent meta-analysis in which the SAVRY did not predict sexual recidivism over shorter periods of time (Olver et al., 2009).”
Applying Risk/Need Assessment to Probation Practice and its Impact on the Recidivism of Young Offenders (2011, background): “Although there is a substantial literature on other LS versions (e.g., Gendreau et al., 1996; Gendreau et al., 2002; Girard & Wormith, 2004; Holsinger et al., 2006; Simourd & Bruce, 1998; YLS/CMI: Gossner & Wormith, 2007; Jung & Rawana, 1999; Olver et al., 2009; Onifade et al., 2008), only one study”
Examining the Validity of a Juvenile Offending Risk Assessment Instrument Across Gender and Race/Ethnicity (2013, methodology): “The AUC for the PACT predicting arrest are between .569 and .615, within the .41 to .79 range for second and thirdgeneration tools used with juveniles found previously (Olver et al., 2009; Schwalbe, 2007).”
A Meta-Analysis Exploring the Relationship Between Psychopathy and Instrumental Versus Reactive Violence (2014, background): “When examining sample origin, studies from the United States and Canada tend to have significantly larger effect sizes (kennealy et al., 2010; Olver et al., 2009); however, this is not always consistent (Edens et al.”