Matching Court-Ordered Services with Treatment Needs

By T. A. Vieira, T. Skilling, M. Peterson-badali. 2009

192 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/457203ac86b054d37d01427c72ff033da561bf77

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. J. Bonta
2. Demetra Andrews
3. T. Skilling
4. M. Peterson-badali
5. Nina Vitopoulos
6. J. Wormith
7. J. Levenson
8. G. Willis

In Sociology and Political Science

1. J. Bonta
2. Demetra Andrews
3. M. Peterson-badali
4. Nina Vitopoulos
5. T. Skilling
6. J. Wormith
7. J. Levenson
8. G. Willis

Citations in the corpus

• Rehabilitating criminal justice policy and practice. (2010, background): “Vieira, Skilling, and Peterson-Badali (2009) found that young offenders who had their criminogenic needs met by court mandated treatment services had lower recidivism rates than youths who did not have their needs addressed.”
• The Relationship Between Matching Service to Criminogenic Need and Recidivism in Male and Female Youth (2012, background): “…in female youth found in the existing literature (Catchpole & Gretton, 2003; Jung & Rawana, 1999; Olver et al., 2009; Onifade et al., 2008, Vieira et al., 2009), as well as in the present study, supports the notion that it does, in fact, address many of the factors leading to recidivism…”