Introduction to Special Issue: Innovation and Productivity Performance in the UK

220 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Sustainable supply chain management: Evolution and future directions (2011, background): “clearly communicates how the review was performed (Denyer and Neely, 2004).”
Entrepreneurship as practice: systematic literature review of a nascent field (2019, methodology): “SLR has long been used in the management and entrepreneurship fields (Tranfield, Denyer, and Smart 2003; Denyer and Neely 2004; Pittaway and Cope 2007; Pittaway et al. 2004; Busenitz et al. 2003; Mian, Lamine, and Fayolle 2016; Liñán and Fayolle 2015).”
Innovation Management Measurement: A Review (2006, unknown): “The notion of systematic review has recently gained currency in the management literature (Denyer and Neely 2004), and the strategy for this review followed, in many respects, the methodology detailed by Tranfield et al. (2003).”
A qualitative meta-analysis of trust in supervisor-subordinate relationships (2015, background): “This search was based on key references which had been missed by the systematic search process, which is important to compensate for the rigidity of ‘mechanistic’ searches (Denyer and Neely, 2004).”
Intellectual Capital, Innovation and Performance: a Systematic Review of the Literature (2012, background): “Systematic reviews, usually applied in the medical sciences, have recently gained momentum in the management literature (Denyer & Neely, 2004).”