Arithmetic and the brain.

By Stanislas Dehaene, N. Molko, Leonardo G. Cohen, Anna J. Wilson. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 2004

712 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Education, Statistics and Probability

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3aaf5c85d910266cf3d9cfc35dab88770bcf6ccc

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

In Education

In Statistics and Probability

Citations in the corpus

Relating effortful control, executive function, and false belief understanding to emerging math and literacy ability in kindergarten. (2007, neutral): “Using functional brain imaging, parietal‐frontal cortical circuitry known to be important for executive function abilities (Klingberg, 2006) has been shown to support the representation of numerosity and the solution of simple calculation problems ( Dehaene, Molko, Cohen, & Wilson, 2004; Prabhakara”
Faith and Fate: Limits of Transformers on Compositionality (2023, neutral): “For instance, humans can solve 3-digit by 3-digit multiplication arithmetic after learning basic calculation rules [18, 28].”
Age-related Changes in the Activation of the Intraparietal Sulcus during Nonsymbolic Magnitude Processing: An Event-related Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study (2006, background): “Functional neuroimaging studies with human adults have consistently shown that areas in and around the left and right intraparietal sulcus (IPS) are engaged during calculation and numerical magnitude processing (Venkatraman, Ansari, & Chee, 2005; Dehaene, Molko, Cohen, & Wilson, 2004; Delazer et a”
Large-Scale Brain Networks in Cognition: Emerging Principles (2010, neutral): “…focused mainly on its role in language and semantic processing (Binder et al., 2009; Brownsett and Wise, 2009) and spatial attention and orienting (Chambers et al., 2004), but it has also been implicated in verbally mediated fact retrieval during mathematical cognition tasks (Dehaene et al., 2004).”
Neuroscience and education: from research to practice? (2006, neutral): “This 'number sense' capacity depends on parietal, prefrontal and cingulate areas, with the horizontal segment of the bilateral intraparietal sulcus (HIPS) playing a central part in the basic representation and manipulation of quantit”
Low numeracy and dyscalculia: identification and intervention (2010, background): “There is evidence that the numerosity processing is an inherited capacity, one that has deep evolutionary roots (Agrillo, Dadda, Serena, & Bisazza, 2009; Ansari, 2008; Butterworth, 2000; Dehaene, Molko, & Cohen, 2004; Feigenson, Dehaene, & Spelke, 2004).”
Individual differences in mathematical competence predict parietal brain activation during mental calculation (2007, neutral): “, less automatic fact retrieval and stronger recruitment of the quantity system) than multiplication problems (Dehaene et al., 2004; Duffau et al., 2002; Ischebeck et al., 2006).”
Interactions between number and space in parietal cortex (2005, neutral): “The parietal basis of number processing The past 10 years have seen an explosion of interest in the neural basis of basic mathematical processes such as subitizing, addition, subtraction and multiplicatio”
Functional Imaging of Numerical Processing in Adults and 4-y-Old Children (2006, result): “A random-effects analysis that directly compared activity to number and shape deviants revealed bilateral number-related activity localized to the IPS and extending into the inferior and superior parietal lobules consistent with previous studies that tested adults with Arabic numeral stimuli, symbol”
The fusiform face area: a cortical region specialized for the perception of faces (2006, neutral): “Ongoing work is investigating the possibility that the human brain also contains cortical regions selectively involved in other domains of cognition, such as number (Dehaene et al. 2004; Shuman & Kanwisher 2004), language (Caplan 2001) and music (Peretz & Zatorre 2005).”