Assessing contributions to group assignments

By Lucy Johnston *, L. Miles. 2004

184 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: General Psychology, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3a4c3124d7628020ccbb5c6c00f96ff1d349379a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In General Psychology

1. D. Baker

In Social Psychology

1. Fabian Homberg
2. S. Takeda
3. Jan-Willem Strijbos
4. J. Brouwer
5. D. Baker

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Jan-Willem Strijbos
2. D. Baker
3. S. Takeda
4. Fabian Homberg

Citations in the corpus

• The effects of gender on group work process and achievement: an analysis through self‐ and peer‐assessment (2014, background): “…of group work focus on evaluating peer-evaluation instruments (Johnson & Smith, 1997; Baker, 2008), reliability of self-ratings (Lejk & Wyvill, 2001; Johnston & Miles, 2004) and peer-ratings (Burke, 1969; Magin, 2001; Ryan et al., 2007), rather than examining students’ group work process through…”
• Unfolding collaborative learning assessment literacy: a reflection on current assessment methods in higher education (2020, background): “Intra-group peer assessment can stimulate participation of students in groups, and reduce free-riding behaviour and social loafing (Johnston and Miles 2004; Shiu et al. 2012; Sridharan, Muttakin, and Mihret 2018).”
• Peer Assessment in Small Groups: A Comparison of Methods (2008, methodology): “For example, Johnston and Miles (2004) found that members rated themselves higher than their teammates did, and there was no correlation between self and peer assessments.”