Developing and managing knowledge through intellectual capital statements

By Jan Mouritsen, P. N. Bukh, H. Larsen, Mette Rosenkrands Johansen. 2002

240 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Communication, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/39a7434f89406501a6a65c4a7cb85617f6b9a505

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Communication

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

Intellectual capital disclosure payback (2011, background): “have highlighted the existing market benefits of reporting IC (Edvinsson, 1997; van der Meer-Kooistra and Zijlstra, 2001; Meritum Project, 2002; Kremp and Mairesse, 2002; Mouritsen, 2002; Peña, 2002; Marr, 2003; Mouritsen and Bukh, 2003; Systematic, 2004; Abdolmohammadi, 2005; Sonnier et al., 2007; ”
Measuring and intervening: how do we theorise intellectual capital management? (2004, background): “It is by putting narrative, efforts, indicators, pictures and ambition together that suddenly it becomes clear what kind of knowledge resource is interesting to firms (Mouritsen et al., 2002).”
Intellectual capital measurement: a critical approach (2009, background): “Traditionally, the use of narrative in IC has been seen to offer reasoning behind an organisation's management and subsequent disclosure of IC ( Mouritsen et al. , 2002, p. 14”
The performance of intellectual capital: Mobilising relationships between intellectual and financial capital in a bank (2011, background): “, 2007), on the ambiguous relationships between intellectual capital and organisational outcomes such as innovation (Cuganesan, 2005; Mouritsen et al., 2002), and to relationships between intellectual capital information and knowledge management strategies (Mouritsen et al.”
Intellectual Capital : Definitions, Categorization and Reporting Models (2008, methodology): “Even for the few that do, it is quite abstract (Grant, 1997) or they talked about theories on too broad context that do not address how it relates to practical matters (Johansson et al., 2001; Mouritsen et al., 2002; Wood, 2003).”
Intellectual capital - defining key performance indicators for organizational knowledge assets (2004, background): “This means that knowledge assets are fundamental strategic levers in order to manage business performance and the continuous innovations of a company (Marr and Schiuma, 2001; Mouritsen et al., 2002; Quinn, 1992; Boisot, 1998).”
Dealing with the knowledge economy: Intellectual capital versus balanced scorecard (2005, background): “Captions such as “Quality of life”, “Frictionless education in flexible networks”, and “Intelligent solutions” are headlines of knowledge narratives of firms that differentiate themselves on their capability rather than on industry-specific conditions of competition (see Mouritsen et al., 2002).”
The Evolving research on intellectual capital (2008, background): “ Mouritsen et al. (2002) argue and illustrate that the object of IC statements is knowledge management activities.”
Intellectual capital: disentangling an enigmatic concept (2006, methodology): “A similar approach is used by Mouritsen et al. (2002, p. 12) who view IC as organisation-wide knowledge resources that, in combination, are constitutive for capabilities, making it possible for the organisation to take action.”
The relevance of intellectual capital disclosure: A paradox? (2003, background): “…the literature is connected with some ambiguousness, intellectual capital reports take another perspective since they report on the knowledge management activities and disclose indicators for intellectual capital on the basis of the managerial initiatives in the firms (cf. Mouritsen et al., 2002).”