Judgment under uncertainty: Frontmatter

By Daniel Kahneman, Paul Slovic, Amos Tversky. 1982

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Manipulating and Measuring Model Interpretability (2018, background): “[68] Amos Tversky and Daniel Kahneman.”
How science makes environmental controversies worse (2004, background): “22 For example, the propensity of experts to display overconfidence in probability estimates has long been recognized (Kahneman et al., 1982).”
Intuition: A Challenge for Psychological Research on Decision Making (2010, background): “Fourth—and perhaps most influentially—the “heuristics and biases” program on probabilistic reasoning (Kahneman, Slovic, & Tversky, 1982; Tversky & Kahneman, 1974) contributed to the impression that, in many inferential tasks, intuitive judgments are systematically biased.”
Visual Representation: Implications for Decision Making (2007, background): “By changing the presentation of a given problem, visual representations may accentuate biases and heuristics in decision making (Gilovich, Griffin, and Kahneman 2002; Hutchinson, Alba, and Einstein 2004; Kahneman, Slovic, and Tversky 1982).”
Demystifying Intuition: What It Is, What It Does, and How It Does It (2010, background): “Most authors (e.g., Chen & Chaiken, 1999; Hogarth, 2001; Kahneman et al., 1982; Myers, 2002; Nisbett & Ross, 1980; Petty & Wegener, 1999) acknowledge that intuition has important positive features, such as being rapid and effortless but on balance consider it to be often inaccurate and inferior to…”
Statistical Significance and the Dichotomization of Evidence (2017, background): “Indeed, evaluating evidence under uncertainty is well-known to be quite difficult (Tversky and Kahneman 1974).”