Dimensional comparisons: An experimental approach to the internal/external frame of reference model.
By Jens Möller, Olaf Köller. 2001
165 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3968eb56fc14ba8a022d1cbb5c3a8c0a6c3f4bfd
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Herbert W. Marsh
- O. Lüdtke
- Ulrich Trautwein
- Alexandre J. S. Morin
- Thomas Goetz
- Reinhard Pekrun
- P. Parker
- Jens Möller
In Social Psychology
- Herbert W. Marsh
- O. Lüdtke
- Ulrich Trautwein
- Alexandre J. S. Morin
- Reinhard Pekrun
- Thomas Goetz
- Jens Möller
- P. Parker
In Sociology and Political Science
- Herbert W. Marsh
- Ulrich Trautwein
- O. Lüdtke
- Jens Möller
- Mei-Shiu Chiu
- P. Parker
- Benjamin Nagengast
- Alexandre J. S. Morin
Citations in the corpus
- A Meta-Analysis of Relations Between Achievement and Self-Concept (2020, methodology): “Furthermore, the I/E model assumptions have been substantiated in cross-sectional (Marsh & Hau, 2004), longitudinal (Marsh & Köller, 2004; Möller & Köller, 2001b; Möller, Retelsdorf, et al., 2011; Möller et al., 2014; Niepel et al., 2014), diary (Möller & Husemann, 2006), and experimental studies…”
- The Reciprocal Internal/External Frame of Reference Model (2011, methodology): “Regrettably, there have to date been only a few relevant studies (e.g., Köller, Klemmert, Möller, & Baumert, 1999; Marsh et al., 2001; Marsh & Köller, 2004; Marsh & Yeung, 1998; Möller & Köller, 2001b; see the following for more details).”
- Gender and course selection in upper secondary education: Effects of academic self-concept and intrinsic value (2006, methodology): “Strong empirical support for the I/E model has been provided by both experimental (e.g., Möller & Köller, 2001) and longitudinal studies (e.g., Marsh & Yeung, 1997), and its cross-cultural generalizability has been demonstrated by Marsh and Hau (2004).”
- On the Effects of Social, Temporal, and Dimensional Comparisons on Academic Self-Concept (2018, methodology): “They were also used for example by Helm and Möller (2017) and Möller and Köller (2001), and found to be reliable and valid in achievement contexts: (a) “With some of such problems like in the figure (word) analogies test, I know from the start that I just won’t get them,” (b) “Even if I do my best,…”
- The Domain Specificity of Academic Emotional Experiences (2006, methodology): “, for testing the control-value theory of emotions developed by Pekrun, [2000; in press], or a recently developed model linking achievement goals and affect by Linnenbrink & Pintrich, [2002]).”
- Achievements and self-concepts in a comparison of math and science: exploring the internal/external frame of reference model across 28 countries (2008, methodology): “The I/E model has been widely used to examine data for students from different countries: Canada (Marsh et al., 1988), Germany (Möller & Köller, 2001), Hong Kong (Lee et al., 2000; Marsh et al., 2001), Norway (Skaalvik & Rankin, 1995), the United Arab Emirates (Abu-Hilal & Bahri, 2000), and the Un”
- The Internal/External Frame of Reference Model of Self-Concept and Achievement Relations (2015, background): “…al., in press; Möller & Marsh, 2013) demonstrates that self- perceptions may also be the result of internal or dimensional comparisons, in which accomplishments in one school subject can serve as a frame of reference for another school subject (e.g., Möller et al., 2009; Möller & Köller, 2001).”
- Between- and within-domain relations of students' academic emotions. (2007, background): “Pekrun et al. (2002a) found a similar pattern of relationships for academic emotions experienced by university students.”