Can Basic Individual Differences Shed Light on the Construct Meaning of Assessment Center Evaluations

By J. M. Collins, Frank L. Schmidt, M. Sanchez-Ku, L. Thomas, Michael A. McDaniel, Huy Le. 2003

88 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Education, Management Science and Operations Research

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/39074a1a28119df9a064e462f1944e4eabf838bf

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

1. Martin Kleinmann
2. Filip Lievens
3. Cornelius J. Konig

In Education

1. Filip Lievens

In Management Science and Operations Research

1. Filip Lievens
2. Cornelius J. Konig
3. Martin Kleinmann

Citations in the corpus

• A different look at why selection procedures work (2011, background): “This appears even more plausible when one considers that cognitive ability correlates with performance in ACs (Collins et al., 2003; Hoeft & Schuler, 2001; Meriac, Hoffman, Woehr, & Fleisher, 2008), in interviews (Berry, Sackett, & Landers, 2007; Huffcutt et al., 1996), and on the job (Schmidt &…”
• In Defense of Personality Measurement: New Wine for Old Whiners (2005, background): “Collins et al. (2003) found 524 articles containing correlations between measures of personality and cognitive ability and performance in assessment centers.”