C. Gluud
Statistics and Probability · 2001–2017
A researcher in the Science corpus: 12 papers; trusts 11 researchers and is trusted by 10 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.
Subfields
- Statistics and Probability — 81 citations into it; #4,659 of 12,932 by trust here, #755 by citations
- Economics and Econometrics — 32 citations into it
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health — 27 citations into it; #2,308 of 2,368 by trust here, #842 by citations
- General Health Professions — 13 citations into it
- Surgery — 13 citations into it
- Pharmacology — 9 citations into it
- Molecular Biology — 8 citations into it; #8,342 of 17,773 by trust here, #7,842 by citations
- Social Sciences & Humanities — 6 citations into it
Whom C. Gluud trusts overall
Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.
- Julian P. T. Higgins
- John P. A. Ioannidis
- J. Wetterslev
- K. Thorlund
- S. Thompson
- J. Brok
- G. Guyatt
- J. Sterne
- J. Jakobsen
- Douglas G. Altman
Who trusts C. Gluud overall
Papers from C. Gluud's perspective
Ordered by how strongly the researchers C. Gluud trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.
- How vague is vague? A simulation study of the impact of the use of vague prior distributions in MCMC using WinBUGS
- The appropriateness of asymmetry tests for publication bias in meta-analyses: a large survey (Canadian Medical Association Journal)
- Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias (PLoS ONE)
- GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction-GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables. (Journal of Clinical Epidemiology)
- Empirical evidence of bias in treatment effect estimates in controlled trials with different interventions and outcomes: meta-epidemiological study (British medical journal)
- Predicting the extent of heterogeneity in meta-analysis, using empirical data from the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (International Journal of Epidemiology)
- Evaluating non-randomised intervention studies. (Health Technology Assessment)
- Statistical heterogeneity in systematic reviews of clinical trials: a critical appraisal of guidelines and practice (Journal of Health Services Research and Policy)
- The Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman method for random effects meta-analysis is straightforward and considerably outperforms the standard DerSimonian-Laird method (BMC Medical Research Methodology)
- CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (British medical journal)
Their papers
- Empirical evidence of bias in treatment effect estimates in controlled trials with different interventions and outcomes: meta-epidemiological study (2008) — 2,397 citations
- Reported Methodologic Quality and Discrepancies between Large and Small Randomized Trials in Meta-Analyses (2001) — 2,064 citations
- Association of funding and conclusions in randomized drug trials: a reflection of treatment effect or adverse events? (2003) — 761 citations
- Trial sequential analysis reveals insufficient information size and potentially false positive results in many meta-analyses. (2008) — 985 citations
- Influence of Reported Study Design Characteristics on Intervention Effect Estimates From Randomized, Controlled Trials (2012) — 1,002 citations
- Trial sequential analysis may establish when firm evidence is reached in cumulative meta-analysis. (2008) — 1,687 citations
- When and how should multiple imputation be used for handling missing data in randomised clinical trials – a practical guide with flowcharts (2017) — 2,280 citations
- Can trial sequential monitoring boundaries reduce spurious inferences from meta-analyses? (2009) — 758 citations
- Thresholds for statistical and clinical significance in systematic reviews with meta-analytic methods (2014) — 608 citations
- Trial Sequential Analysis in systematic reviews with meta-analysis (2017) — 1,038 citations
- Apparently conclusive meta-analyses may be inconclusive--Trial sequential analysis adjustment of random error risk due to repetitive testing of accumulating data in apparently conclusive neonatal meta-analyses. (2009) — 801 citations
- Antioxidant supplements for prevention of gastrointestinal cancers: a systematic review and meta-analysis. (2004) — 632 citations