How to Define and Examine the Implicitness of Implicit Measures.
By J. de Houwer, Agnes Moors. 2007
161 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/36bd6ab5af72e6d2ec492b34b3de69172912cbce
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Bertram Gawronski
- Malte Friese
- Wilhelm Hofmann
- S. Loughnan
- Nick Haslam
- J. de Houwer
- Yoshihisa Kashima
- Karl Frederic MacDorman
Citations in the corpus
- Implicit bias in healthcare professionals: a systematic review (2017, background): “There is broad agreement in psychology that methods known as ‘implicit measures’, including the affective priming task, the IAT and the affective Simon task, reveal implicit attitudes [19].”
- On Assessing the Political Effects of Racial Prejudice (2009, background): “Implicit attitudes are typically thought to have at least some of the following features: uncontrolled, unintentional, stimulus driven, unconscious, and fast (De Houwer & Moors 2007).”
- Implicit measures: A normative analysis and review. (2009, methodology): “On the basis of the work of Borsboom (Borsboom, 2006; Borsboom, Mellenbergh, & van Heerden, 2004) and De Houwer (De Houwer, 2006; De Houwer & Moors, 2007; Moors & De Houwer, 2006), we first provide a normative analysis of the concept “implicit measure.””
- Understanding the Relationship between Attribute-Based and Metaphor-Based Dehumanization (2009, methodology): “In contrast, when time and cognitive resources are constrained through the use of an implicit technique (De Houwer & Moors, 2007), people are unable to employ these processes and thus only direct learning effects are found.”
- The Dominance of Associative Theorizing in Implicit Attitude Research: Propositional and Behavioral Alternatives (2011, unknown): “Recent work by De Houwer and colleagues may prove useful in this respect (e.g., De Houwer, 2006a, 2006b; De Houwer & Moors, 2007; De Houwer et al., 2009a).”
- A cultural task analysis of implicit independence: comparing North America, Western Europe, and East Asia. (2009, unknown): “…biases are called implicit here, not because the instrument is implicit (it is not) but because the biases result from one’s habits rather than from one’s explicit beliefs or goals (see De Houwer & Moors, 2007, for more nuanced differences among various tendencies that are referred to as implicit).”
- When and why do implicit measures predict behaviour? Empirical evidence for the moderating role of opportunity, motivation, and process reliance (2008, background): “In a related vein, more research is needed on the interrelations of the various implicit measures in order to extend the scarce theoretical and empirical evidence in this area (for notable contributions see Bosson, Swann, & Pennebaker, 2000; Brauer, Wasel, & Niedenthal, 2000; Cunningham, Preacher, &”
- Changing explicit and implicit attitudes: The case of self-esteem (2009, background): “While some researchers argue that people can be aware of their implicit attitudes, others posit that implicit attitudes are unconscious (see De Houwer & Moors, 2007).”
- Does Japan really have robot mania? Comparing attitudes by implicit and explicit measures (2008, background): “Implicit measures are measurement outcomes that may indicate a purported construct by means of processes that are uncontrolled, unintentional, unconscious, efficient, effortless, fast, goal-independent, autonomous, or driven solely by the stimulus (De Houwer and Moors 2007).”
- The implicit association test outperforms the extrinsic affective Simon task as an implicit measure of inter-individual differences in attitudes. (2007, background): “Implicit measures of attitudes can be defined as measures that capture attitudes in an automatic manner (De Houwer & Moors, 2007).”