Handbook of Qualitative Research
By A. Parry. 2002
9,687 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Education, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/364621a63b45f31acb6548e0130dc82222cf7c51
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Education
- Dawn O. Braithwaite
- Sharon M. Kolb
- V. Venkatesh
- Susan A. Brown
- C. Tsui
- Hillol Bala
- Sandra K. Abell
- Christine Greenhow
In Sociology and Political Science
- Susan A. Brown
- V. Venkatesh
- Hillol Bala
- A. Casey
- Victoria A. Goodyear
- Shirley Gregor
- Susan V. Scott
- Michael I. Barrett
Citations in the corpus
- The Effect of Service Evaluations on Behavioral Intentions and Quality of Life (2006, methodology): “Data analysis was undertaken using a standardized approach, which involved several stages (e.g., Denzin and Lincoln 1994; Miles and Huberman 1994).”
- School-Family Relations In Context (2003, methodology): “Poststructuralist theoretical underpinnings were used to help guide data analysis procedures (Denzin & Lincoln, 1994).”
- A Content Analysis of the Content Analysis Literature in Organization Studies: Research Themes, Data Sources, and Methodological Refinements (2007, methodology): “Several other qualitative methodologies potentially could be applied in conjunction with content analysis techniques (Denzin & Lincoln, 1994; Gephart, 1991).”
- Executive Function Coaching for College Students with Learning Disabilities and ADHD: A New Approach for Fostering Self–Determination (2009, methodology): “This analytic approach entailed constant comparison across data sources as we considered “groups, concepts, and observations . . . to develop an understanding that encompasses all instances of the process, or case, under investigation” (Denzin & Lincoln, 1994, p. 202).”
- Grounded theory and the constant comparative method : valid research strategies for educators (2012, methodology): “Measures that can be taken to promote validity in a study are reflexivity, documentation, theoretical sampling, negative case analysis and transferability (Denzin & Lincoln, 2005).”
- Using Qualitative Methods to Inform Scale Development (2007, background): “In qualitative research, disclosure of choices made by the researcher(s) and the thinking involved in making those choices are essential in clarifying the assumptions and theoretical/philosophical dimensions of the methodology (Denzin & Lincoln, 2000; Patton, 2002).”
- Quality in Qualitative Studies: The Case of Validity, Reliability and Generalizability (2011, background): “These criteria are (Guba and Lincoln, 1994): internal validity, the degree to which the results can be attributed to treatment; external validity, the generalizability of the results; reliability, the extent to which the findings can be replicated; objectivity, the extent to which the findings are f”
- Understanding Genetics: Analysis of Secondary Students' Conceptual Status. (2007, background): “…analysis and interpretation of data generated explanations that led to formulation of assertions to be confirmed or disconfirmed through triangulations (e.g., data, methodological, and theoretical triangulation) (Denzin & Lincoln, 1994; Erickson, 1986, 1998; Fraser & Tobin, 1991; Gallagher, 1991).”
- Learning to be a Qualitative Management Researcher (2009, background): “…place within a number of different epistemological and ontological positions (Alvesson and Sköldberg, 2000; Lincoln and Guba, 2000; Prasad, 2005; Symon and Cassell, 2004) or ‘historical moments’ (Denzin and Lincoln, 2005: 3), and therefore it can mean many different things to different researchers.”
- Do You Want Your Students to Be Job-Ready with 21st Century Skills? Change Pedagogies: A Pedagogical Paradigm Shift from Vygotskyian Social Constructivism to Critical Thinking, Problem Solving and Siemens’ Digital Connectivism (2014, background): “It postulates on the nature of learning, relationships involved, the principles that underpin those relationships and the structural and cultural dynamics responsible for causes and effects of what happens (Denzin & Lincoln, 2000).”