The challenges of innovating for sustainable development

By Jeremy Hall, H. Vredenburg. 2003

497 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/35f72f28e48e8d0e2ca671d1c4d1310bc6a15d08

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. Carl Folke
2. P. Olsson
3. Frances Westley
4. J. Pinkse
5. S. Kennedy
6. Frank Boons
7. Bruno Silvestre
8. Ans Kolk

Citations in the corpus

• Sustainability in entrepreneurship: A tale of two logics (2011, background): “…Zandbergen, 1995; Jermier et al., 2006; Shrivastava, 1994), the issues of environmentalism and social responsibility increasingly appear at the forefront of entrepreneurship and small business research (e.g. Cohen and Winn, 2007; Dean and McMullen, 2007; Hall and Vredenburg, 2003; Schaper, 2002).”
• A perspective on multinational enterprises and climate change: Learning from “an inconvenient truth”? (2008, background): “One factor that determines the impact of climate change is the technological change that its emergence brings about (Hall & Vredenburg, 2003) as well as the reaction of MNEs to this change (Helfat & Peteraf, 2003).”
• Open innovation and its effects on economic and sustainability innovation performance (2019, background): “…defined as the creation of products, services, and processes resulting – from a full life-cycle perspective – in less negative environmental and/or increased social impact compared to relevant alternatives and consider the needs of future generations (Hall & Vredenburg, 2003; Kemp & Pearson, 2007).”
• Sustainable innovation, business models and economic performance: an overview (2013, background): “Furthermore, the product innovation literature increasingly distinguishes socalled discrete and complex product architectures because the appropriation of profits from innovation differs between these two types with implications especially for business model choices (Hall and Vredenburg, 2003; Davie”
• Geographical proximity and innovation: Evidences from the Campos Basin oil & gas industrial agglomeration—Brazil (2009, background): “Hall and Vredenburg (2003) found that Suncor Energy, a large Canadian oil sands operator, were able to exploit technological competencies through non-technological innovation.”
• The Governance of Global Value Chains: Unresolved Human Rights, Environmental and Ethical Dilemmas in the Apple Supply Chain (2015, background): “This is due to stakeholders groups becoming more heterogeneous (Freeman and Evan 1991; Harrison and Freeman 1999) and associated rights, claims or interests being conflicting or difficult to reconcile (Hall and Vredenburg 2003).”
• Mainstreaming Green Product Innovation: Why and How Companies Integrate Environmental Sustainability (2010, background): “Challenges in green product innovation Companies that develop and market innovative green products seem to face several challenges but empirical studies that report on these challenges are scant (Berchicci and Bodewes, 2005; Hall and Vredenburg, 2003; Ottman et al., 2006).”
• Understanding why firms should invest in sustainable supply chains: a complexity approach (2012, background): “…issues are emerging as the key challenge in sustainable supply chains, as they may involve many stakeholders (Sharma and Henriques 2005) with disparate goals, demands and opinions that may interpret the same situation differently, what Hall and Vredenburg (2003, 2005) call ‘stakeholder ambiguity’.”
• Radical Innovation for Sustainability: The Power of Strategy and Open Innovation (2016, background): “Furthermore, incumbent companies are less likely to initiate processes for radical innovations as they may prefer less disruptive innovation that seeks to leverage current competencies (Bower and Christensen, 1995; Hall and Vredenburg, 2003; Hockerts and Wüstenhagen, 2010).”
• The Sustainable Approach to Corporate Social Responsibility: A Global Analysis and Future Trends (2019, background): “These lines of research bring together all the concepts related to the sustainable approach of Corporate Social Responsibility, since it includes dynamics related to sustainable development in a globalized and connected world [150] and with management implying the active role of the organization [15”
• Tipping Toward Sustainability: Emerging Pathways of Transformation (2011, background): “…institutional arrangements, including the institutional pressures and incentives (governance regimes, market incentives, and cultural values) that attract and shape the emergence of both technical and social innovation, mediate against an appropriate and creative response to complex challenges.”