A Rose by Any Name? The Values Construct

By M. Rohan. 2000

1,085 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/359ed80bb1b19fb9c78a6ba3bc3e63e565f714f1

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Social Psychology

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Values at Work: The Impact of Personal Values in Organisations (2019, positive): “This model is currently the dominant theory in values’ research (Rohan, 2000; Knafo, Roccas, & Sagiv, 2011; see also Maio, 2010) and many of the studies on the implications of values in organisational settings in the last two decades are based on it.”
Contemporary perspectives on the psychology of attitudes (2004, background): “Values can subsume a variety of abstract ideals, subsume global evaluations of these ideals, and include affective, cognitive, and behavioral components (Maio & Olson, 1998; Rohan, 2000).”
A Social Values Analysis of Self–Other Differences in Decision Making Involving Risk (2008, methodology): “That risk taking is seen as both positive and negative can also be seen in Schwartz's work on the structure of the value system (eg, Schwartz, 1992 ; see also Rohan, 2000 ).”
Reactions to counterstereotypic behavior: the role of backlash in cultural stereotype maintenance. (2004, background): “Indeed, the need to balance personal values with conformity to others’ values has been described as a fundamental human conflict (Allport, 1955; Rohan, 2000).”
Values and Subjective Well-Being (2018, background): “What Values Are and How They Are Structured Both psychologists and lay people view values as broad motivational constructs that express what is important to people (e.g., Rohan, 2000; Rokeach, 1973; Schwartz, 1992).”
Personal Value Priorities and National Identification (2010, background): “Values are cognitive, social representations of basic motivational goals that serve as guiding principles in people's lives (Rohan, 2000; Rokeach, 1973; Schwartz, 1992).”
Mental representations of social values (2010, background): “Notwithstanding a long history of diverse perspectives on values (Rohan, 2000), social psychologists tend to define them as abstract ideals that are important guiding principles in one’s life (Allport et al., 1960; Feather, 1975; Kluckhohn, 1951; Rokeach, 1968; Schwartz, 1992).”
Deciding to Persist: Adversity, Values, and Entrepreneurs’ Decision Policies (2013, background): “We set out to investigate individual values because the psychology literature shows a strong link between values and choosing among alternatives (Feather, 1995) and provides a comprehensive and universal framework for researching behavioral decisions (Rohan, 2000).”
Values Following a Major Terrorist Incident: Finnish Adolescent and Student Values Before and After September 11, 2001 (2006, background): “The study of values has reemerged as a major topic for social psychological investigation in the past decade, with value systems seen as an important superordinate cognitive structure with considerable implications for individual behavior (Rohan, 2000; Schwartz & Bilsky, 1990).”
Value Orientations and Environmental Beliefs in Five Countries (2007, background): “Values are considered to be important because they are general in nature and therefore may affect various beliefs and behaviors simultaneously (Rohan, 2000; Rokeach, 1973).”
Beyond Engagement:Toward a Framework and Operational Definition for Employee Work Passion (2009, background): “Consider, for example, the debate regarding the definition of values (Rohan, 2000) or the construct of burnout (Maslach, Schaufeli, & Leiter, 2001).”