Innovation systems: analytical and methodological issues
By B. Carlsson, Staffan Jacobsson, Magnus Holmén, Annika Rickne. 2002
1,261 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Management of Technology and Innovation, Political Science and International Relations, Strategy and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3574a1ea329193090bc2d6be9b82b4cf3dd8a05b
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Management of Technology and Innovation
- David Urbano
- Maribel Guerrero
- Alain Fayolle
- Mike Wright
- L. Klerkx
- Donald S. Siegel
- Marko P. Hekkert
- Bernhard Truffer
In Political Science and International Relations
- L. Klerkx
- Karoline S. Rogge
- David Urbano
- Bernhard Truffer
- Marko P. Hekkert
- Jochen Markard
- Maribel Guerrero
- D. Spielman
In Strategy and Management
- Bernhard Truffer
- Marko P. Hekkert
- L. Klerkx
- David Urbano
- Jochen Markard
- Maribel Guerrero
- Mike Wright
- Simona Negro
Citations in the corpus
- The technological innovation systems framework: Response to six criticisms (2015, methodology): “Since its inception (Carlsson and Stankiewicz, 1991), the framework has seen several conceptual developments, including a clarification of scoping issues (Carlsson et al., 2002), TIS functions as a central tool for performance assessment (Bergek et al.”
- Comparing approaches to systems of innovation: The knowledge perspective (2004, background): “Systemic links between technological systems and SSI rest on the science-technology relation and technological complementarities or synergistic inter-technology/inter-sector dependence [45].”
- The Local Sources of Market Formation: Explaining Regional Growth Differentials in German Photovoltaic Markets (2012, background): “, 2002 ), the sector (Malerba, 2002 ), the region (Cooke et al.”
- The impact of the EU ETS on the sectoral innovation system for power generation technologies - Findings for Germany (2010, background): “…different levels of analysis: nation states (Freeman, 1987; Lundvall, 1992; Nelson, 1993), sectors (Malerba, 2002, 2004, 2005), or technologies (Carlsson et al., 2002; 2 The impact of the EU ETS on the sectoral innovation system for power generation technologies - Findings for Germany Carlsson…”
- Innovation ecosystems: A conceptual review and a new definition (2020, neutral): “…economists in the 1980s and 90s, generating a rich stream of literature on various types of innovation systems with a main focus on actors and institutions, while a related literature in economic history of technology focused more on artifacts in technological systems (cf. Carlsson et al., 2002).”
- Exploring technology paths: The development of alternative transport fuels in Sweden 2005-2020 (2008, background): “The cognitive dimension [21], or the knowledge base of the technological system, constrains what actors are able to do.”
- Integration of market pull and technology push in the corporate front end and innovation management—Insights from the German software industry (2009, methodology): “Identifying actors in organizations is critical and sometimes methodically difficult due to the rapid change of corporate knowledge, especially through structural shifts of the responsible individuals (Carlsson et al., 2002).”
- The sources and aims of innovation in services: Variety between and within sectors (2003, background): “A second alternative is to study strategic networks (Gualti et al., 2000) or ‘systems of innovation’ (e.g., Carlsson et al., 2002), that is of service and other firms that are interdependent in their innovation activities.”
- Innovation systems and the competitive process in developing economies (2008, background): “Ecologies are typically national in scope, with sub national degrees of variation, which reflect rules of law and language, business practice and the social and political regulation of business (Carlsson, 1997; Carlsson et al, 2002; Cooke et al, 2002).”
- Creativity and regional innovation: Evidence from EU regions ★ (2014, background): “The key insight of the systemic view is indeed the recognition of the centrality of relationships and the mutual influences among the actors in the system (Carlsson et al., 2002).”