The sources and aims of innovation in services: Variety between and within sectors

By Bruce S. Tether. 2003

328 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Management of Technology and Innovation, Marketing, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c7780fe2daf88f97e3eb92c69e90a78ca997d274

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Management of Technology and Innovation

In Marketing

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY AND INNOVATION IN THE KNOWLEDGE INTENSIVE BUSINESS SERVICE SECTOR (2008, background): “Tether (2003) emphasizes that user–producer cooperation might be fruitful for creating complex and new-to-the-market innovations.”
THE ELIXIR (OR BURDEN) OF YOUTH? EXPLORING DIFFERENCES IN INNOVATION BETWEEN START-UPS AND ESTABLISHED FIRMS. (2008, background): “7 The third school of thought, the integrative approach, has argued that services and manufacturing do not follow entirely different approaches and that some aspects of services can also be used to understand the rest of the economy (Droege et al. 2009; Gallouj and Savona 2009; Tether 2003a).”
External Linkages, R&D and Innovation Performance in US Business Services (2007, result): “These findings, especially concerning service firms’ interactions and relationships with customers, support those of previous empirical research (Gallouj and Weinstein, 1997; Gadrey and Gallouj, 1998; Djellal and Gallouj, 2000; Sundbo and Gallouj, 2000; Tether, 2003).”
Innovation in services – how different from manufacturing? (2008, methodology): “The increasing volume of literature focussing on service sector innovation (see, among others, Arvanitis, 2008; Sirilli & Evangelista, 1998; Tether, 2003) and the specificities of service innovation (pointed out for instance by Sundbo & Gallouj, 1999) take us back to the important question of…”
Do Services Innovate (Differently)? Insights from the European Innobarometer Survey (2005, methodology): “Whilst this marked an important advance for the study of services and their innovation activities (Tether et al., 2001; Tether, 2003), it involved using a tool designed with manufacturing and ‘‘technological product and process (TPP) innovation’’ in mind (OECD et al., 1996), and making small…”
Patterns of Technological Innovation in Knowledge‐Intensive Business Services (2006, background): “There is little evidence that the impact of firm size on innovation is less in KIBS, and no evidence that it may be negative (cf. Miles, 2001; Tether, 2003).”
Barriers to innovation and public policy in Catalonia (2008, unknown): “For that reason, neither innovation nor the proportion of innovators can be measured, although the effect within innovative firms differs, as do the externalities of the location (Tether 2002). Int Entrep Manag J (2008) 4:431–451 433”
Delivering Public Services: Time for a new theory? (2010, background): “This literature emphasizes fundamental change in service delivery processes, rather than simply the creation or redesign of a product (for example, Gallouj 2002; Tether 2003; Blazevic and Lievens 2004; Magnusson et al. 2003).”
Open service innovation and the firm's search for external knowledge (2014, methodology): “…2000; Powell and Grodal, 2005) and inter-organizational learning (Argote & Ingram, 2000; Brown & Duguid, 2000; Cohen & Levinthal, 1990; Coombs, Harvey & Tether 2003; Noteboom, 1999; Pavitt, 1998; Rosenberg, 1982; Rothwell, Freeman, Horsley, Jervis, Robertson & Townsend,1974; von Hippel, 1988).”
Public sector innovation research: What’s next? (2010, background): “A similar difficulty, for example, visits the differential innovation performance of manufactur- Volume 12, Issue 2, August 2010 INNOVATION: MANAGEMENT, POLICY & PRACTICE ing versus service sectors (Tether 2003).”