Is consideration of future consequences a changeable construct
By V. Toepoel. 2010
96 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/35739a84db522648c8bedb1cc93878ac20a9bb8b
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Developmental and Educational Psychology
- Heidi Bruderer Enzler
- Sharon K. Parker
- Andranik Tumasjan
- Isabell M. Welpe
- K. Strauss
- Jeffrey R. Nicol
- Steven A. Arnocky
- Matthias Spörrle
In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Sharon K. Parker
- K. Strauss
- Heidi Bruderer Enzler
- Andranik Tumasjan
- Isabell M. Welpe
- Jeffrey R. Nicol
- Steven A. Arnocky
- Matthias Spörrle
In Social Psychology
- K. Strauss
- Sharon K. Parker
- Heidi Bruderer Enzler
- Andranik Tumasjan
- Isabell M. Welpe
- Jeffrey R. Nicol
- Steven A. Arnocky
- Matthias Spörrle
Citations in the corpus
- Consideration of Future Consequences as a Predictor of Environmentally Responsible Behavior (2015, background): “Recently, a number of studies suggest that the instrument might be two-dimensional with one factor used to capture the preoccupation with future outcomes and one covering concern with immediate outcomes (Adams, 2012; Joireman et al., 2008; Rappange et al., 2009; Toepoel, 2010).”
- Intervening to Enhance Proactivity in Organizations: Improving the Present or Changing the Future (2018, background): “While future orientation is stable over the course of a year (Toepoel, 2010), individuals may experience events which influence the extent to which they consider the future consequences of their behavior (Strathman et al.”
- Time Perspective and Sustainable Behavior (2014, result): “…Sprott, Spangenberg, & Schultz, 2008; Joireman, Kees, & Sprott, 2010; Joireman, Shaffer, Balliet, & Strathman, 2012; Petrocelli, 2003; Rappange, Brouwer, & Van Exel, 2009; Toepoel, 2010); one encompassing concern with future consequences and another encompassing concern with immediate consequences.”
- Easy Now, Desirable Later: The Moderating Role of Temporal Distance in Opportunity Evaluation and Exploitation (2013, methodology): “Moreover, since it can be argued that our results are also influenced by participants’ future orientation, we additionally controlled for participants’ consideration of future consequences (Toepoel, 2010).”