Sizing the opportunity: the quality and extent of online education in the united states

By I. Allen, J. Seaman. 2003

493 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The Effectiveness of Online and Blended Learning: A Meta-Analysis of the Empirical Literature (2013, background): “Top-Level Coding Structure for the Meta-Analysis Study Condition Codes • Author • Learner age • Learner incentive for involvement in the study • Learner type • Learning setting • Subject matter • Type of publication • Year of publication Online Learning Practice Codes • Dominant approach to learner ”
FACTORS THAT INFLUENCE STUDENTS’ DECISION TO DROPOUT OF ONLINE COURSES (2019, background): ““While there is now some statistical information available on distance education at higher education institutions in the United States, very few, if any, research surveys have focused on online education” [5].”
Interaction, Internet self-efficacy, and self-regulated learning as predictors of student satisfaction in online education courses (2014, background): “Student satisfaction is an important indicator of the effectiveness of a course and is critical to the success of distance programs (Allen & Seaman, 2003; Biner, Welsh, Barone, Summers, & Dean, 1997; Keller, 1987).”
SENSE OF COMMUNITY IN ONLINE COURSES (2006, unknown): “Even though these concerns may be to be dwindling, 40% of academic leaders still report their faculties fail to embrace online teaching (Allen & Seaman, 2003).”