The boundaries of trust: own and others' actions in the US and China
By Nancy R Buchan, Rachel T. A. Croson. 2004
183 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Safety Research, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/31fecd0b7988331cb7e945e73def7dec55b743b4
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Safety Research
- Simon Gächter
- Benedikt Herrmann
- John A. List
- Christian Thöni
- Ernst Fehr
- Andreas Leibbrandt
- Uri Gneezy
- Armin Falk
In Social Psychology
- Holly Brower
- M. Grillo
- David C. Wilson
- John A. List
- Miguel A. Teixeira
- Simon Gächter
- Scott W. Lester
- Audrey Korsgaard
In Sociology and Political Science
- Benedikt Herrmann
- Simon Gächter
- Christian Thöni
- Andreas Leibbrandt
- John A. List
- Uri Gneezy
- Holly Brower
- M. Grillo
Citations in the corpus
- It Isn’t Always Mutual (2015, background): “Buchan and Croson (2004) found Chinese participants were marginally more trusting than U.S. participants and significantly more trustworthy than U.S. participants.”
- Trust and growth: a shaky relationship (2008, unknown): “Renquin is an honor code that entails a negative attitude towards being in debt, both socially and financially, which Buchan and Croson (2004) see as a special and important influence on cooperation and trust.”
- Does Democracy Foster Trust? (2009, unknown): “However, their findings do not concur with the experimental results by Buchan and Croson (2004).”
- Residential Satisfaction and Civic Engagement: Understanding the Causes of Community Participation (2010, result): “In regards to ethnocentrism, studies have shown that civic networks comprised of only in-group members are more cohesive and function more efficiently than networks comprised of both in and out-group members (Stolle 1998; Buchan and Croson 2004; Tajfel and Turner 2004) These findings are also supp”
- Trust, voluntary cooperation, and socio-economic background: survey and experimental evidence (2004, background): “Ashraf et al. (2003), Buchan and Croson (2004), Buchan et al. (2002), Willinger et al. (2003), andDanielson and Holm (2003)are examples of studies that look at cross-cultural differences in the trust game.”
- Trust and Trustworthiness (2018, unknown): “1998b, Chen et al. 2002). Conversely, individualists (such as Australia, Canada, and the U.S.) do not embrace a strong affinity for social groups and are less subject to the in-group bias. These results suggest that when there is no prospect for long-term relationships, we should expect spontaneous ”
- Ode to the sea: Workplace Organizations and Norms of Cooperation (2016, result): “Since our findings suggest that socio-ecological factors play a decisive role in the proliferation of cooperation norms it may help to explain the scale and variance of cooperation in different societies reported in other studies (Roth et al., 1991; Hayashi et al., 1999; Henrich et al., 2001; Buchan”
- Charity begins at home: cultural differences in social discounting and generosity (2014, background): “To explore the tendency to maintain harmony in the group, Buchan and Croson (2004) investigated the influence of differing social distances on trust and trustworthiness in a trust game (Berg, Dickhaut, & McCabe, 1995) with Chinese and American subjects.”