STANDARDS OF VALIDITY AND THE VALIDITY OF STANDARDS IN PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT

By S. Messick. 2005

700 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Education, Management Science and Operations Research

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/30e9b3e563bbe26613336b12564bdc11b784c141

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

In Education

In Management Science and Operations Research

Citations in the corpus

A Psychometric Network Perspective on the Validity and Validation of Personality Trait Questionnaires (2019, background): “There are many views on what validity means with the most common perspectives involving the interpretation of test scores (e.g. Cronbach and Meehl, 1955; Kane, 2013; Messick, 1995).”
Constructing Validity: New Developments in Creating Objective Measuring Instruments (2019, background): “Loevinger (1957) championed the concept of structural validity (see also Messick, 1995)—that a scale’s internal structure (i.e., interitem correlations) should parallel the external structure of the target trait (i.e., correlations among nontest manifestations of the trait), and that items should…”
Examining Language in Context: The Need for New Research and Practice Paradigms in the Testing of English-Language Learners (2003, background): “Whereas it has been recognized that cognitive validity can provide evidence on construct-relevant and irrelevant sources of score variance (Messick, 1995b), this perspective on validity still reflects a view of cognition as independent of culture (Resnick, 1991).”
The Reliability, Validity, and Utility of Self-Assessment (2006, background): “Others, like Messick (1995) argue that adverse consequences undermine validity only if the problem is the result of a poor fit of the test with what it purports to measure.”
12 Structural Equation Modeling in Management Research: A Guide for Improved Analysis (2009, background): “The idea that measures cause constructs is difficult to reconcile with the notion that measures are merely observed scores (Edwards & Bagozzi, 2000; Howell et al., 2007; Messick, 1995).”
Certification Testing as an Illustration of Argument-Based Validation (2004, background): “…that the assessment involves task presentations and/or response formats that are different from those in the KSJ domain (e.g., written responses in an area where the performances of ultimate interest are mainly oral or physical), irrelevant method variance may be introduced (Messick, 1989, 1995).”
Two Criteria for Good Measurements in Research: Validity and Reliability (2017, background): “Convergent validity: It refers to the extent to which scores on a measure share a high, medium or low relationship with scores obtained on a different measure intended to assess the similar construct [Messick, 1995].”
Tools for direct observation and assessment of clinical skills of medical trainees: a systematic review. (2009, background): “Unnamed68 Other/not specified History, communication (13) Scale (1-4) with adjective and behavioral anchors No No Kuder-Richardson 20 reliability coefficients Concurrent validity No”