Job and Work Analysis

By P. Sackett, P. Walmsley, Roxanne M. Laczo. 2003

107 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Biomedical Engineering, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2fcaf5884433f6446beb931065ac08d8857ae91e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

1. Juan I. Sanchez
2. Gregory W. Stevens

In Biomedical Engineering

1. Gregory W. Stevens

In Social Psychology

1. Gregory W. Stevens
2. M. Campion
3. Juan I. Sanchez
4. E. Levine
5. Shaw-Chiang Wong

Citations in the corpus

• What is (or should be) the difference between competency modeling and traditional job analysis (2009, background): “…have opined that at least some CM applications are merely watered-down, less-than-rigorous job analysis (Barrett & Callahan, 1997; Pearlman, 1997), or that CM does not accomplish anything that new forms of strategic-oriented job analysis cannot accomplish (Barney, 2000; Sackett & Laczo, 2003).”
• A Critical Review of the Science and Practice of Competency Modeling (2013, methodology): “…been perceived as a fundamental prerequisite to many organizational activities (e.g., selection, performance appraisal, training and development; Sackett & Laczo, 2003), some have noted that the practice may be largely outdated given the vast changes that have occurred within the business…”
• DOING COMPETENCIES WELL: BEST PRACTICES IN COMPETENCY MODELING (2011, background): ““Future-oriented” job analysis or “strategic” job analysis is often mentioned in books and teachings on job analysis (e.g., Brannick et al., 2007; Sackett & Laczo, 2003; Society of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 2003), but the experience of the authors is that future-oriented…”