Methods for dealing with multiple outcomes in meta-analysis: a comparison between averaging effect sizes, robust variance estimation and multilevel meta-analysis

256 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Interventions to Improve Fraction Skills for Students With Disabilities: A Meta-Analysis (2019, methodology): “Jordan, Resnick, Rodrigues, Hansen, and Dyson (2017) conducted a longitudinal study to understand how fraction knowledge develops for third- through sixth-grade students with and without mathematics disabilities.”
Methodological Guidance Paper: High-Quality Meta-Analysis in a Systematic Review (2019, methodology): “Meta-analysis of single-case studies (Moeyaert et al., 2017) and meta-analysis of structural equation models (Cheung, 2015) also account for the dependent nature of the meta-analytic data using multilevel”
A Guide to Conducting a Meta-Analysis with Non-Independent Effect Sizes (2019, background): “Similar findings were also made in Moeyaert et al. (2017).”
Advancing the social identity theory of leadership: A meta-analytic review of leader group prototypicality (2020, methodology): “…for nonindependence of effect sizes, we therefore used a three-level meta-analytic model that explicitly models the effects of independent samples and of different effect size indices (for reviews, see Moeyaert et al., 2017; Van den Noortgate et al., 2014; Van den Noortgate & Onghena, 2003).”