Uncertainty management: the influence of uncertainty salience on reactions to perceived procedural fairness.
By K. van den Bos. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2001
672 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: General Decision Sciences, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2ec05117561001330993208e707df474aa6f8852
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In General Decision Sciences
- J. Prooijen
- N. Jostmann
- J. Colquitt
- Kate Zipay
- Wijnand Adriaan Pieter Van Tilburg
- Eric Raymond Igou
- Brent A. Scott
- Tessa Melkonian
In Social Psychology
- J. Colquitt
- J. Prooijen
- Brent A. Scott
- T. Pyszczynski
- Michael Inzlicht
- T. Proulx
- N. Jostmann
- Adam M. Grant
In Sociology and Political Science
- J. Colquitt
- J. Prooijen
- Kate Zipay
- Brent A. Scott
- O. Epitropaki
- N. Jostmann
- T. Judge
- Wijnand Adriaan Pieter Van Tilburg
Citations in the corpus
- Anxious Uncertainty and Reactive Approach Motivation (RAM) for Religious, Idealistic, and Lifestyle Extremes (2013, background): “…into thoughts about their real life goal dilemmas (McGregor et al., 2001) or requiring them to reflect on personal insecurities (Van den Bos, 2001)—in both cases participants reacted with the same kinds of extremism as after mortality salience (see also McGregor Prentice, & Nash, 2009;…”
- The Five “A”s of Meaning Maintenance: Finding Meaning in the Theories of Sense-Making (2012, background): “More recently, theorists have concluded that affirmation efforts also derive from violations of one’s sense of “self,” arousing a sense of subjective (Hogg, Adelman, & Blagg, 2010) or personal (Van den Bos, 2001) uncertainty, which in turn evokes efforts to affirm values that restore the “self.””
- On the subjective quality of social justice: The role of affect as information in the psychology of justice judgments (2003, methodology): “Following earlier research (e.g., Van den Bos, 2001b, 2001c; Van den Bos & Miedema, 2000; Van Prooijen et al., 2002), participants were then told that before the experimenter would divide the lottery tickets between them and Other, they would be asked to complete a number of questions that were un”
- The Teasing Effect: An Underappreciated Benefit of Creating and Resolving an Uncertainty (2018, background): “, it likely causes negative feelings such as anxiety and worry (Buhr and Dugas 2002; Chew and Ho 1994; Gordon 2003; Mandel and Nowlis 2008; Van den Bos 2001;Wu 1999).”
- Belief in conspiracy theories: The influence of uncertainty and perceived morality (2013, methodology): “These results indicate that the effects of the uncertainty salience manipulation cannot be attributed to changes in participants’ mood, which is consistent with previous research (Van den Bos, 2001).”
- Ethical Leadership and Ethical Voice: The Mediating Mechanisms of Value Internalization and Integrity Identity (2021, background): “By processing these cues, followers reduce uncertainty (Van den Bos, 2001) and develop a more nuanced understanding of their normative work environment—that is, what the key values and work expectations are and what behaviors get rewarded or punished.”
- Revisiting How and When Perceived Organizational Support Enhances Taking Charge (2015, background): “Second and similarly, when employees are more uncertain about the stability of their work structures, they tend to be more preoccupied with how fairly treated they are (Lind & van den Bos, 2002; van den Bos, 2001; van den Bos & Lind, 2002).”
- Uncertainty During Organizational Change: Types, Consequences, and Management Strategies (2003, background): “Van den Bos (2001) has re cently demonstrated that fairness of treatment is more important when uncertainty is high.”