Human resource management–well‐being–performance research revisited: Past, present, and future

By R. Peccei, K. van de Voorde. Human Resource Management Journal, 2019

244 citations recorded by the source corpus.

The authors provide an up‐to‐date theoretically based qualitative review of research dealing with the relationship between HRM, employee well‐being, and individual/organisational performance (HRM‐WB‐IOP research). The review is based on a systematic critical analysis of all HRM‐WB‐IOP studies (N = 46) published in 13 core HRM and management journals in the 2000 to 2018 period. The authors first identify different theoretical models of the HRM‐WB‐IOP relationship, which they then use to map research in the area. The results show that mutual gains conceptualisations play a dominant role in extant HRM‐WB‐IOP research, at the expense of alternative conflicting outcomes and mutual losses models, which are also shown to receive very limited empirical support across the 46 studies. As part of this mapping exercise, the authors identify important knowledge gaps in the area and conclude by setting out a number of key recommendations for future research to address these gaps.

Subfields: General Health Professions, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2e085c4f257a2348fa86891f28380b960f9671cc

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In General Health Professions

1. R. Peccei
2. Adelien Decramer
3. Thomas Van Waeyenberg

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

1. R. Peccei
2. Adelien Decramer
3. Thomas Van Waeyenberg
4. T. Lew

In Social Psychology

1. R. Peccei
2. Adelien Decramer
3. Thomas Van Waeyenberg
4. T. Lew

Citations in the corpus

• Performance management and teacher performance: the role of affective organizational commitment and exhaustion (2020, background): “It is noteworthy to mention that in the HRM literature, the more physical indicators of well-being are often reported to be incongruent with performance outcomes (e.g. Peccei et al., 2013; Peccei & Van De Voorde, 2019; Van De Voorde et al., 2012).”