Agenda 2000 — Social judgment and attitudes: warmer, more social, and less conscious

By Norbert Schwarz. 2000

95 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2dd1dbcd45c070c1e5c32a643d757f1004a7e97d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

1. John T. Jost
2. Mahzarin R. Banaji
3. Norbert Schwarz
4. Gregory Walton
5. Aradhna Krishna
6. Gün Refik Semin
7. G. Maio
8. G. Haddock

In Social Psychology

1. John T. Jost
2. Norbert Schwarz
3. Mahzarin R. Banaji
4. A. Eagly
5. G. Maio
6. Amanda Diekman
7. Bas Verplanken
8. Gün Refik Semin

In Sociology and Political Science

1. John T. Jost
2. Mahzarin R. Banaji
3. A. Eagly
4. Amanda Diekman
5. Gregory Walton
6. Aradhna Krishna
7. Arie W. Kruglanski
8. G. Haddock

Citations in the corpus

• What is the Problem? Prejudice as an Attitude-in-Context (2008, result): “This approach is consistent with the attitudes-as-constructions position often advocated by attitude researchers (e.g., Schwarz, 2000; Wilson & Hodges, 1992).”
• On the nature of attitude-behavior relations: the strong guide, the weak follow (2002, background): “Researchers favoring a construal view on attitudes are skeptical with regard to the impact of attitudes on behavior and argue that attitudes are mainly contextdependent and therefore not stable over time (e.g. Schwarz, 2000; Schwarz & Bohner, 2001).”
• The Estrangement of Social Constructionism and Experimental Social Psychology: History of the Rift and Prospects for Reconciliation (2002, background): “JOST & KRUGLANSKI With regard to research styles, we think that experimentalists are generally better than social constructionists at persuading their opponents to change opinions, mainly because experimentalists are more concerned with using consensually accepted methods (e.g., Aronson et al., 1998”
• Contemporary perspectives on the psychology of attitudes (2004, background): “Several heuristics have been described in the literature helping people to explicitly form attitudes on the spot with little cognitive effort (e.g., Schwarz, 2000).”
• Socially Situated Cognition: Cognition in its Social Context (2004, background): “, & Schwarz, N. (1999). Telling what they want to know: Participants tailor”
• Sensory marketing, embodiment, and grounded cognition: A review and introduction (2014, background): “While the information processing paradigm facilitated enormous progress in psychological research, it also came with its own blind spots (for a discussion, see Schwarz, 2000).”
• Being What You Say: The Effect of Essentialist Linguistic Labels on Preferences (2004, methodology): “This research portrays attitudes not as stable representations recalled at will but as temporary constructions whose manifestation is influenced by a wide variety of cognitive and social factors (Banaji & Prentice, 1994; DeSteno & Salovey, 1997; Mitchell, Nosek, & Banaji, 2003; Schwarz, 2000).”