Responding in Conversation: A Study of Response Particles in Finnish

By M. Sorjonen. 2001

297 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Language and Linguistics, Literature and Literary Theory

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2c4de94d13001f7aef4db7e30c3f2afd0ea4814e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Language and Linguistics

In Literature and Literary Theory

Citations in the corpus

Deontic Authority in Interaction: The Right to Announce, Propose, and Decide (2012, methodology): “As usual, these utterances are declaratives in the indicative mood; they present future facts (see Sorjonen, 2001, pp. 108–111) without any contingencies (see Curl & Drew, 2008).”
The Achievement of Intersubjectivity through Embodied Completions: A Study of Interactions Between First and Second Language Speakers (2006, background): “…(e.g. turn-taking, sequence, repair, preference, etc.) described by CA studies appear to operate across different languages and cultures (e.g. Sorjonen 1996, 2001; Hakulinen 2001; on Finnish; Egbert 1996, 1997a, 1997b; Golato 2000, 2002; on German; Mori 1999; Tanaka 1999; Hayashi 2003; on…”
Mobile phone call openings: tailoring answers to personalized summonses (2006, background): “‘Oh hello’ might be the closest translation for the Finnish ‘no terve’, however, ‘oh’ is also a change of state token (Heritage, 1984), which the Finnish ‘no’ is not (Raevaara, 1989; Sorjonen, 2001), making ‘oh hello’ a misleading translation.”
Comparing Single and Double Sayings of the German Response Token ja and the Role of Prosody: A Conversation Analytic Perspective (2008, background): “In recent years, conversation analysts and interactional linguists have increasingly turned their attention to the study of response tokens (such as yeah, uh hm, oh, and their foreign language equivalents).1 Work on English (Drummond & Hopper, 1993a, 1993b, 1993c; Gardner, 1995, 1997, 1998, 2002; He”
How can insights from conversation analysis be directly applied to teaching L2 pragmatics? (2006, unknown): “…2000; 2002; 2005; Günthner, 1996; 1999; Schuetz, 2001; Taleghani-Nikazm, 2002a; forthcoming, for German; Ford and Mori, 1994; Fox et al., 1996; Hayashi, 1999; 2003; Hayashi et al., 2002 for Japanese; Sorjonen, 2001a; 2001b for Finnish; Taleghani-Nikazm, 1999; 2002a; 2002b for Persian, among others.”
Recognition and Interpretation: Responding to Emotional Experience in Psychotherapy (2010, background): “Nii as a response to a display of understanding by the therapist confirms the therapist's view on the patient's experience ( Sorjonen, 2001 ; Ruusuvuori, 2005 ).”
Facial and Verbal Expressions in Assessing Stories and Topics (2009, background): “In line 13 she utters a nii response that marks a place of maximum incompleteness in the story ( Sorjonen, 2001 , pp.”
Problems in the Research Problem: Critical Feedback and Resistance in Academic Supervision (2009, background): “In the Finnish conversation, the particle “joo” can work as a sufficient minimal response to directives (Sorjonen, 2001 ), but these ones are not produced at points where they would confirm the directive.”
A Comparative Conversation Analytic Study of Formulations in Psychoanalysis and Cognitive Psychotherapy (2013, background): “Sorjonen (2001) has shown that the Finnish response particle nii is used in situations where the first speaker has asserted something that is related to his/her sphere of experience.”