Indicators of Child Well-Being: the Promise for Positive Youth Development

By K. Moore, L. Lippman, B. Brown. 2004

131 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Positive Indicators of Child Well-Being: A Conceptual Framework, Measures, and Methodological Issues (2011, unknown): “Moore et al. (2004) , Carle et al. (2009), and Carle et al. (2011) have examined criteria and methods for defining cutoffs.”
Dimensionality of the Chinese Positive Youth Development Scale: Confirmatory Factor Analyses (2010, background): “... (a) provide access to data on youth by building a data archive; (b) monitor the changes in youth development across time; (c) lay the groundwork for future programs and policies related to youth development; (d) building international data that allows countries which have comparable indicators o”
Children with Different Levels of Hope: Are There Differences in Their Self-esteem, Life Satisfaction, Social Support, and Family Cohesion? (2011, background): “2005). Moore et al. (2004) stated that there is a need for conceptually meaningful set of positive indicators which have to be assessed with reliable and valid measures.”
Social support matters: longitudinal effects of social support on three dimensions of school engagement from middle to high school. (2012, background): “More recent trends in the prevention sciences have reﬂected growing interest in strength-based rather than deﬁ-cit-based studies (Moore, Lippman, & Brown, 2004).”