Effect of surface properties on nanoparticle-cell interactions.

By A. Verma, F. Stellacci. Small, 2010

2,468 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Biomaterials, Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, Molecular Biology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2c3fb9a74f6096b8277d133272d2b1dab06568d9

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Biomaterials

1. S. Tang
2. I. Lo

In Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials

1. S. Tang
2. I. Lo
3. Li Shang
4. Arturo Keller
5. G. Ulrich Nienhaus
6. Kendra L Garner

In Molecular Biology

1. S. Tang
2. I. Lo
3. S. Gaisford

Citations in the corpus

• Emerging patterns for engineered nanomaterials in the environment: a review of fate and toxicity studies (2014, background): “Functional groups on the NP surface often determine solubility (Verma and Stellacci 2010).”
• Nanoparticle–membrane interactions (2018, background): “Moreover, it has been recently observed that the details of the NP surface topology have considerable effect on cellular uptake [21].”
• Physicochemical Properties of Nanomaterials: Implication in Associated Toxic Manifestations (2014, neutral): “Basically, shape dependent nanotoxicity influences the membrane wrapping processes in vivo during endocytosis or phagocytosis [37].”
• Fe2O3 magnetic nanoparticles to enhance S. lycopersicum (tomato) plant growth and their biomineralization (2016, background): “The rates of NPs uptake, intracellular localization as well as biomineralization in different plants have been reported (Mailander and Landfester 2009; Verma and Stellacci 2010; Delehanty et al. 2009).”
• Barriers, pathways and processes for uptake, translocation and accumulation of nanomaterials in plants – Critical review (2016, background): “Nevertheless, in Mammals, such molecules and NPs with special size, shape and surface charge, such as iron oxide NPs, functionalized CNTs, as well as cationic QDs, dendrimers, and other metallic NPs are clearly able to cross the cell membrane (Bhirde et al., 2011; Verma & Stellacci, 2010).”
• Engineered nanoparticles interacting with cells: size matters (2014, background): “Regardless of the specific internalization mechanism, the cell-NP interactions are, on the one hand, modulated by physicochemical properties of the NPs including size, shape, surface charge and surface chemistry [14] and, on the other hand, by cell-specific parameters such as cell type or cell cycle”
• Engineered nanomaterials for water treatment and remediation: Costs, benefits, and applicability (2016, neutral): “reduced toxicity [521, 522].”
• Surface-Charge-Dependent Cell Localization and Cytotoxicity of Cerium Oxide Nanoparticles (2010, neutral): “For instance, at 4 °C the endocytic/pinocytic mechanism is arrested.(24) 26 Thus, after incubating cells (10000 cells) with the various DiI-labeled nanoceria preparations (1.”
• Interaction of nanoparticles with proteins: relation to bio-reactivity of the nanoparticle (2013, background): “Curved NP surfaces compared to planar surfaces provide extra flexibility and enhanced surface area to the adsorbed protein molecules [25].”