Emerging patterns for engineered nanomaterials in the environment: a review of fate and toxicity studies

By Kendra L Garner, Arturo Keller. Journal of nanoparticle research, 2014

296 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Comparative environmental fate and toxicity of copper nanomaterials (2017, background): “The bioavailability of Cu depends on speciation (ionic, complexed, or nano, oxidation states) and environmental factors including pH, redox potential, water, soil and sediment type, water hardness, and organic content (Garner and Keller, 2014; Flemming and Trevors, 1989; Cornelis et al., 2014).”
Effect of temperature and SiO2 nanoparticle size on wettability alteration of oil-wet calcite (2017, background): “environment [6] and pollution [7, 8], water treatment [9, 10], food production [11-13], polymer composite [14], stable emulsions [15, 16], heat transfer [17, 18], corrosion protection [19], conductive materials [20], heterogeneous catalysis [21], and subsurface applications including drilling [22], ”
Trophic transfer of metal-based nanoparticles in aquatic environments: a review and recommendations for future research focus (2016, result): “…mimicking turbulent systems, sedimentation rates in the same order of magnitude for different ENPs under different salinity and aging time is seen.90 This is in contrast with the reported data from Garner and Keller (2014)91 highlighting the complexity of determining these factors for Me-ENPs.”