L1 Influence on the Acquisition of L2 Collocations: Japanese ESL Users and EFL Learners Acquiring English Collocations.

263 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Examining second language receptive knowledge of collocation and factors that affect learning (2017, background): “The limitation of the frequency-based approach is that some semantic factors that may affect learnability of collocational items such as congruency (see Wolter & Gyllstad 2011, 2013; Yamashita & Jiang, 2010) and transparency (see Moon, 1998; Nesselhauf, 2003) are not taken into account.”
FREQUENCY OF INPUT AND L2 COLLOCATIONAL PROCESSING (2013, methodology): “Yamashita and Jiang ( 2010 ) describe this scenario as follows: We can imagine that, because congruent collocations can be accepted on the basis of their L1 counterparts, the frequency of encounters may not be as important for congruent collocations as it would be for incongruent ones in order to…”
Gauging the effects of exercises on verb–noun collocations (2014, background): “…the verb in these collocations that learners substitute by an unconventional choice (*do a mistake), and such substitutions are likely to be due to interference from the mother tongue when equivalent first-language nouns collocate with a different verb (Nesselhauf, 2005; Yamashita & Jiang, 2010).”