TOURISTS' EVALUATIONS OF DESTINATION IMAGE, SATISFACTION, AND FUTURE BEHAVIORAL INTENTIONS—THE CASE OF MAURITIUS
By Girish Prayag. 2009
409 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2bb02cbc030a27505c250380321375652401404a
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
- D. Stylidis
- Girish Prayag
- Jong-Hyeong Kim
- Hung-Che Wu
- Hailin Qu
- Amir Shani
- Yaniv Belhassen
- Pimtong Tavitiyaman
In Sociology and Political Science
- D. Stylidis
- Girish Prayag
- Amir Shani
- Yaniv Belhassen
- K. Woosnam
- Jong-Hyeong Kim
- Choong‐Ki Lee
- Hung-Che Wu
Citations in the corpus
- Effects of tourism information quality in social media on destination image formation: The case of Sina Weibo (2017, background): “…group of scholars has highlighted the importance of destination image formation and found that destination image is positively associated with perceived quality of a destination (Lee et al., 2005), travel satisfaction (Prayag, 2009), and intention to visit the destination (Chew & Jahari, 2014).”
- Destination Image and Behavior Intention of Travelers to Thailand: the Moderating Effect of Perceived Risk (2013, methodology): “The study by Rittichainuwat et al. (2001) assessed the current image of Thailand as well as identified the strengths and weaknesses of Thailand as an international travel destination. The study positioned Thailand as a shopping paradise, in turn putting Thailand in direct competition with Singapore ”
- Destination Image Components and Word-of-Mouth Intentions in Urban Tourism: A Multigroup Approach (2018, background): “In existing literature, future behavior has mainly been operationalized as intention to revisit a destination and/or a willingness to recommend the destination to others (WOM communication; e.g., Hosany, Ekinci, and Uysal, 2007; Prayag, 2009).”
- From desktop to destination: User-generated content platforms, co-created online experiences, destination image and satisfaction (2020, background): “At the destination, tourist evaluations of the destination are based on pre-conceived imagery of what they would experience at a destination (Kladou & Mavragani, 2015; Prayag, 2009; Wang & Hsu, 2010).”
- Destination image and tourist loyalty: A meta-analysis (2014, neutral): “Prayag (2009); 29.”
- Destination Image and Brand Personality of Jamaica: A Model of Tourist Behavior (2014, background): “In another study, Prayag (2009) similarly found that destination image influences future behavior directly and indirectly.”
- The moderating role of past experience in the formation of a tourist destination's image and in tourists’ behavioural intentions (2013, background): “In this context, the differences between first-time and repeat visitors are receiving renewed interest among tourism researchers (Campo et al., 2010; Fallon & Schofield, 2004; Prayag, 2010).”
- Antecedents of Tourists’ Loyalty to Mauritius (2012, methodology): “…of homogeneity with respect to the attributes defining an individual’s perceptions (Beerli and Martin 2004), the majority of studies have relied on lists of attributed measures using scaling methods to assess image perceptions (Gallarza, Saura, and Garcia 2002; Tasci and Gartner 2007; Prayag 2009).”
- The Impact of Tour Service Performance on Tourist Satisfaction and Behavioral Intentions: A Study of Chinese Tourists in Hong Kong (2015, background): ““Satisfaction with tour services” was hypothesized to be related to seven types of tour services based on previous research that treated satisfaction as something that emerges from the services themselves (LeBlanc, 1992; Prayag, 2009).”
- The Moderating Effect of Travel Experience in a Destination on the Relationship Between the Destination Image and the Intention to Revisit (2012, background): “Because of this holistic nature, image plays an integral role in successful destination marketing (Tasci & Gartner, 2007); destinations with strong positive images are more likely to be considered and selected by consumers (Echtner & Ritchie, 2003; Prayag, 2009).”
- A Study of Experiential Quality, Experiential Value, Experiential Satisfaction, Theme Park Image, and Revisit Intention (2018, background): “Service quality is therefore an enduring construct that encompasses quality performance in all activities undertaken by management and employees (Prayag, 2009).”
- Antecedents and outcomes of destination image of Malaysia (2017, background): “destination image? What does the destination image lead to? Prayag and Ryan (2011) have comprehensively modelled the outcomes of destination image by considering place attachment, overall satisfaction, and revisit intention.”
- Destination loyalty modeling of the global tourism (2016, background): “Prior studies (Anderson & Sullivan, 1993; Bigne et al., 2001; Chi & Qu, 2008 Cronin, 2000; Prayag, 2009) establish the link between destination image and satisfaction.”
- Effects of Place Attachment and Image on Revisit Intention in an Ecotourism Destination: Using an Extended Model of Goal-Directed Behavior (2020, background): “Affective image refers to the overall feelings and emotions of tourists toward the destination [35].”
- Destination images, holistic images and personal normative beliefs: Predictors of intention to revisit a destination (2016, background): “a,b) and its mediating role (Prayag, 2009), highlighting its explanatory power in predicting a tourist’s intention to return to a destination they have already visited.”
- Understanding memorable tourism experiences and behavioural intentions of heritage tourists (2021, background): “Revisit intention, which refers to an individual’s readiness and willingness to make a repeat visit (Prayag, 2009) is an S.”