Destination Image Components and Word-of-Mouth Intentions in Urban Tourism: A Multigroup Approach

206 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The effect of place image and place attachment on residents’ perceived value and support for tourism development (2020, background): “In terms of the consequences of tourism image from the residents’ perspective, studies show that some variables such as the perceived impacts of tourism and supportive behavioural intention tend to be affected (Papadimitriou et al., 2018; Tsai, 2015; Kock et al., 2016; Martín-Santana et al., 2017; S”
Destination image and tourist behavioural intentions: A meta-analysis (2020, unknown): “Finally, Papadimitriou et al. (2018) studied the intentions of both past visitors and non-visitors of Athens and included the urban destination and found significant relationship between overall image and intentions of tourists to visit and revisit of the destination.”
The Impact of Self-Congruity and Evaluation of the Place on WOM: Perspectives of Tourism Destination Residents (2021, background): “With the emergence of new technologies, particularly social media, online chats, forums, and virtual realities, residents’ engagement in tourism development is gaining increasing research focus because of their voluntary wordof-mouth (WOM) behaviors (Simpson and Siguaw 2008; Papadimitriou 2015).”